• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 Sprint Fidelis 导线断裂的因素:来自法国多中心注册研究的 5 年结果

Factors predicting Sprint Fidelis lead fracture: Results at 5 years from a French multicentre registry.

作者信息

Piot Olivier, Deballon Ronan, Nitu Dorian, Marquié Christelle, da Costa Antoine, Leclercq Christophe, Defaye Pascal, Sadoul Nicolas

机构信息

Centre cardiologique du Nord, 32, rue des Moulins-Gémeaux, 93207 Saint-Denis cedex, France.

Institut Lorrain du cœur et des vaisseaux, CHU de Nancy-Brabois, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

出版信息

Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Apr;108(4):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.acvd.2014.11.006
PMID:25858538
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The small diameter Sprint Fidelis defibrillation lead has not been implanted in patients since 2007 due to its unusually high rate of fracture. Predictors of lead fracture risk were identified in several studies, mainly in North American studies.

AIM

We established a multicentre registry to determine the lead fracture rate and predictors of fracture in a large cohort of French patients.

METHODS

Nine hundred and eighty-six patients implanted with a Sprint Fidelis lead at six centres between December 2004 and November 2007 were included in this registry.

RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up of 51.4±20 months, the mean fracture rate was 11.2%, and increased over time: 1.2% at 1 year, 3.8% at 2 years, 7.4% at 3 years, 13.9% at 4 years, and 20.7% at 5 years. In multivariable analysis, younger age (<40 years) was associated with a higher risk of fracture compared to patients<40 years, patients aged between 40-60 years had a relative risk of 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.98) and patients>60 years had a relative risk of 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.84) and subpectoral implantation (at 3 years) with a relative risk of 2.35 (95% CI 1.29-4.28). Lead model 6930 (single-coil, passive-fixation) had a relative risk of 3.47 (95% CI 1.13-10.7) compared with the 6949 model (double coil, active-fixation). No other predictor of fracture was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large multicentre cohort of French patients implanted with a Sprint Fidelis electrode, the fracture rate remains high, especially in young patients with submuscular implant and the 6930 electrode model.

摘要

背景

自2007年以来,直径较小的Sprint Fidelis除颤导线因其异常高的断裂率而未再植入患者体内。在多项研究中确定了导线断裂风险的预测因素,主要是在北美进行的研究。

目的

我们建立了一个多中心登记处,以确定一大群法国患者中导线的断裂率及断裂的预测因素。

方法

该登记处纳入了2004年12月至2007年11月期间在六个中心植入Sprint Fidelis导线的986例患者。

结果

平均随访51.4±20个月,平均断裂率为11.2%,且随时间增加:1年时为1.2%,2年时为3.8%,3年时为7.4%,4年时为13.9%,5年时为20.7%。在多变量分析中,与年龄≥40岁的患者相比,年龄<40岁与更高的断裂风险相关,40至60岁的患者相对风险为0.53(95%置信区间[CI]0.29 - 0.98),年龄>60岁的患者相对风险为0.45(95%CI 0.24 - 0.84),以及胸肌下植入(3年时)相对风险为2.35(95%CI 1.29 - 4.28)。与6949型号(双线圈、主动固定)相比,6930型号(单线圈、被动固定)导线的相对风险为3.47(95%CI 1.13 - 10.7)。未发现其他断裂预测因素。

结论

在一大群植入Sprint Fidelis电极的法国多中心患者中,断裂率仍然很高,尤其是在胸肌下植入的年轻患者和6930电极型号的患者中。

相似文献

1
Factors predicting Sprint Fidelis lead fracture: Results at 5 years from a French multicentre registry.预测 Sprint Fidelis 导线断裂的因素:来自法国多中心注册研究的 5 年结果
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Apr;108(4):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.11.006. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
2
Passive-fixation lead failure rates and long-term patient mortality in subjects implanted with Sprint Fidelis electrodes.采用 Sprint Fidelis 电极的患者中被动固定导联失败率和长期患者死亡率。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):258-64. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut185. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
3
Risk of Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead failure is highly dependent on age.Sprint Fidelis 除颤器导联故障的风险高度依赖于年龄。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Jun-Jul;104(6-7):388-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
4
Increasing hazard of Sprint Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure.美敦力 Sprint Fidelis植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障风险增加。
Heart Rhythm. 2009 May;6(5):605-10. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.02.024. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
5
A single-centre experience concerning the safety of Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead extraction at the time of pulse generator replacement or in case of evidence of lead failure.在更换脉冲发生器时或出现导联故障证据时,单次中心经验涉及 Sprint Fidelis 除颤器导联提取的安全性。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Apr;105(4):203-10. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.01.007. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
6
Clinical outcomes in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators and Sprint Fidelis leads.植入式心脏复律除颤器和 Sprint Fidelis 导联患者的临床结局。
Heart. 2013 Jun;99(11):799-804. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303259. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
7
Failure of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a matter of lead size?植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障:导线尺寸的问题?
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Feb;10(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
8
A Comparative Study of Defibrillator Leads at a Large-Volume Implanting Hospital: Results From the Pacemaker and Implantable Defibrillator Leads Survival Study ("PAIDLESS").一家大容量植入医院的除颤器导线比较研究:起搏器和植入式除颤器导线生存研究(“PAIDLESS”)的结果
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jun;27(6):292-300.
9
Sex differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation indications and outcomes: lessons from the Nationwide Israeli-ICD Registry.性别差异在植入式心脏复律除颤器植入适应证和结局中的作用:来自以色列全国 ICD 登记处的经验。
Europace. 2014 Aug;16(8):1175-80. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu015. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
10
Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.小直径高压植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的早期故障
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jul;4(7):892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.03.041. Epub 2007 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and radiographic predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead failure at the time of initial implantation.心血管植入式电子装置初次植入时导线故障的临床和影像学预测因素
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 7;37(4):1086-1092. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12559. eCollection 2021 Aug.