Prabhavathi V, Jacob Josy, Kiran M Shashi, Ramakrishnan Murugesan, Sethi Esha, Krishnan C S
Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics, Raja Rajeshwari Dental College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Professor, Department of Pedodontics, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute of Dental Sciences, Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Int Oral Health. 2015 Feb;7(2):28-32.
Comparison of the demineralization potential of four luting cements, i.e. zinc phosphate, conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified GIC and acid modified composite resin.
This study was conducted on 75 extracted premolar teeth, which were grouped into five, each group containing 15 teeth. Groups were non-banded control, teeth cemented with the above-mentioned cements. These were incubated at 37°C for 30 days in sealable plastic containers, after which the teeth were debanded, cleaned and placed in acid gelatin solution at 37°C for 4 weeks to simulate the cariogenic solution. Then, the teeth were sectioned and examined under scanning electron microscope. The depth of the carious lesions was measured using image analysis with Digimizer software.
The depth of the carious lesions was maximum with non-banded group, followed by zinc phosphate, acid modified composite resin, resin-modified GIC and conventional GIC.
Among the four orthodontic banding cements compared, the enamel demineralization potential is least with conventional GIC, followed by resin-modified GIC, acid modified composite resin and zinc phosphate.
比较四种粘结水门汀,即磷酸锌、传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)、树脂改性GIC和酸改性复合树脂的脱矿潜力。
本研究对75颗拔除的前磨牙进行,将其分为五组,每组15颗牙齿。分组为未粘结对照组、用上述水门汀粘结的牙齿。将这些牙齿在可密封的塑料容器中于37°C孵育30天,之后去除粘结带,清洁牙齿,并将其置于37°C的酸性明胶溶液中4周以模拟致龋溶液。然后,将牙齿切片并在扫描电子显微镜下检查。使用Digimizer软件通过图像分析测量龋损深度。
未粘结组的龋损深度最大,其次是磷酸锌、酸改性复合树脂、树脂改性GIC和传统GIC。
在所比较的四种正畸粘结水门汀中,传统GIC导致的牙釉质脱矿潜力最小,其次是树脂改性GIC、酸改性复合树脂和磷酸锌。