• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统粘结水门汀与聚酸改性复合粘结水门汀及树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的溶解度比较。

Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cement.

作者信息

Karkera Reshma, Raj A P Nirmal, Isaac Lijo, Mustafa Mohammed, Reddy R Naveen, Thomas Mathew

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, A.J. Institute of Dental Sciences Mangaluru, Karnataka, India, e-mail:

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Science and Hospital, Amargadh, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1016-1021.

PMID:27965490
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study was planned to find the solubility of the conventional luting cements in comparison with that of the polyacid-modified composite luting cement and recently introduced resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with exposure to water at early stages of mixing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in vitro study of the solubility of the following five commercially available luting cements, viz., glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Fuji I, GC), zinc phosphate (Elite 100, GC), polyacid-modified resin cement (PMCR) (Principle, Dentsply), polycarboxylate cement (PC) (Poly - F, Dentsply), RMGIC (Vitremer, 3M), was conducted. For each of these groups of cements, three resin holders were prepared containing two circular cavities of 5 mm diameter and 2 mm depth. All the cements to be studied were mixed in 30 seconds and then placed in the prepared cavities in the resin cement holder for 30 seconds.

RESULTS

From all of the observed luting cements, PMCR cement had shown the lowest mean loss of substance at all immersion times and RMGIC showed the highest mean loss of substanceat all immersion times in water from 2 to 8 minutes. The solubility of cements decreased by 38% for GIC, 33% for ZnPO, 50% for PMCR, 29% for PC, and 17% for RMGIC.

CONCLUSION

The PMCR cement (Principle-Dentsply) had shown lowest solubility to water at the given time intervals of immersion. This was followed by PC, zinc phosphate, and GIC to various time intervals of immersion.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较传统粘结水门汀与聚酸改性复合粘结水门汀以及最近推出的树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(RMGIC)在混合早期接触水时的溶解度。

材料与方法

对以下五种市售粘结水门汀进行体外溶解度研究,即玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)(富士I型,GC公司)、磷酸锌水门汀(Elite 100,GC公司)、聚酸改性树脂水门汀(PMCR)(普理灵,登士柏公司)、聚羧酸锌水门汀(PC)(Poly - F,登士柏公司)、RMGIC(Vitremer,3M公司)。对于每组水门汀,制备三个树脂固定器,每个固定器包含两个直径5mm、深度2mm的圆形腔。所有待研究的水门汀均在30秒内混合,然后置于树脂水门汀固定器中制备好的腔中30秒。

结果

在所有观察到的粘结水门汀中,PMCR水门汀在所有浸泡时间的物质平均损失最低,而RMGIC在2至8分钟的水中浸泡所有时间的物质平均损失最高。GIC的水门汀溶解度降低了38%,ZnPO降低了33%,PMCR降低了50%,PC降低了29%,RMGIC降低了17%。

结论

在给定的浸泡时间间隔内,PMCR水门汀(普理灵 - 登士柏公司)对水的溶解度最低。其次是PC、磷酸锌水门汀和GIC,在不同的浸泡时间间隔下溶解度依次降低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Solubility of Conventional Luting Cements with that of the Polyacid Modified Composite Luting Cement and Resin-modified Glass lonomer Cement.传统粘结水门汀与聚酸改性复合粘结水门汀及树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀的溶解度比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1016-1021.
2
In-vitro solubility of three types of resin and conventional luting cements.三种树脂及传统粘结水门汀的体外溶解性
J Oral Rehabil. 1998 Apr;25(4):285-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1998.00228.x.
3
In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.七种粘结剂对牙本质的体外推出强度
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jul-Aug;15(4):365-70.
4
Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements.早期水接触对玻璃离子水门汀溶解性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Oct;80(4):474-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70014-9.
5
Bond strength of luting cements to core foundation materials.粘结水门汀与核桩基础材料的粘结强度。
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010 Mar;31(2):140-6.
6
Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.传统型、树脂改良型玻璃离子水门汀及复合树脂粘结水门汀的断裂韧性
Dent Mater. 1999 Jan;15(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)90024-6.
7
Water sorption and water solubility of current luting cements: an in vitro study.当前粘结水门汀的吸水率和水溶性:一项体外研究。
Quintessence Int. 2008 Mar;39(3):e107-14.
8
Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions.中性和酸性条件下粘结水门汀的刷牙磨损
Oper Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):482-7.
9
Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.不锈钢冠用粘结性和非粘结性粘结水门汀的微渗漏
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):501-4.
10
Confocal laser scanning microscopic observations of secondary caries inhibition around different types of luting cements.不同类型粘结水门汀周围继发龋抑制的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察
Am J Dent. 2005 Aug;18(4):245-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Push-out bond strength and SEM fractographical analysis of hollow fibre posts used with self-adhesive resin cement: a pilot study.空心纤维桩与自粘接树脂水门汀黏结强度的推出试验和扫描电镜断口分析:一项初步研究。
Odontology. 2024 Jan;112(1):158-168. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00820-1. Epub 2023 May 12.
2
Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.牙科水门汀:最新全面综述。
Molecules. 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041619.
3
Push-out bond strength of fiberglass posts cemented with adhesive and self-adhesive resin cements according to the root canal surface.
根据根管表面,用粘结剂和自粘结树脂水门汀粘结的玻璃纤维桩的推出粘结强度。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Jan;33(1):22-26. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 28.