Millett Declan T, Duff Sheena, Morrison Lynsey, Cummings Alistair, Gilmour W Harper
Unit of Orthodontics, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust, Glasgow, Scotland.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):15-20. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.48.
The aim of the study was to compare the mean retentive strength of microetched orthodontic bands cemented to extracted human third molars with a modified composite, a resin-modified glass ionomer cement, and a conventional glass ionomer cement. The mode of band failure and amount of cement remaining on the tooth at deband were also assessed. Finally, survival time of bands with each cement was assessed with simulated mechanical stress in a ball mill. Ninety banded specimens were used to assess retentive strength, and another 30 banded specimens were used to assess survival time. The mean retentive strength of the modified composite (0.415 MPa) was significantly less than that of either the resin-modified (1.715 MPa) or the conventional glass ionomer cement (1.454 MPa; P <.001). Specimens failed predominantly at the cement-enamel interface. The amount of cement remaining on the tooth at deband differed significantly between bands cemented with the resin-modified cement and those cemented with the conventional glass ionomer cement (P <.05). Mean survival time of bands cemented with the resin-modified glass ionomer cement (14.3 hours) was significantly longer (P <.01) than for bands cemented with the conventional glass ionomer cement (9.9 hours) but did not differ significantly from that of bands cemented with the modified composite (11.1 hours; P >.05). Orthodontic bands cemented with the modified composite appear to have a significantly lower mean retentive strength than bands cemented with resin-modified or conventional glass ionomer cement, but mean survival time did not differ significantly for bands cemented with modified composite or resin-modified glass ionomer.
本研究的目的是比较用改良复合树脂、树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀和传统玻璃离子水门汀粘结于拔除的人第三磨牙上的微蚀刻正畸带环的平均固位强度。还评估了带环脱落的方式以及去带环时牙齿上残留的水门汀量。最后,在球磨机中通过模拟机械应力评估每种水门汀粘结的带环的存活时间。90个带环标本用于评估固位强度,另外30个带环标本用于评估存活时间。改良复合树脂的平均固位强度(0.415MPa)显著低于树脂改性(1.715MPa)或传统玻璃离子水门汀(1.454MPa;P<.001)。标本主要在水门汀-釉质界面处脱落。用树脂改性水门汀粘结的带环与用传统玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环在去带环时牙齿上残留的水门汀量有显著差异(P<.05)。用树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环的平均存活时间(14.3小时)显著长于用传统玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环(9.9小时;P<.01),但与用改良复合树脂粘结的带环(11.1小时;P>.05)无显著差异。与用树脂改性或传统玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环相比,用改良复合树脂粘结的正畸带环的平均固位强度似乎显著更低,但用改良复合树脂或树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀粘结的带环的平均存活时间无显著差异。