Agarwal Aakash, Zakeri Amanda, Agarwal Anand K, Jayaswal Arvind, Goel Vijay K
Engineering Center for Orthopaedic Research Excellence (ECORE), Department of Bioengineering and Orthopaedics surgery, Colleges of Engineering and Medicine, University of Toledo, 5051 Nitschke Hall MS 303, 2801 W. Bancroft St., Toledo, OH 43606, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Ansari Nagar E., Gautam Nagar, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, Delhi 110029, India.
Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1848-55. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Growth rods are used to limit the progression of scoliosis without restraining the opportunity for the spine to grow. However, major complications like rod breakage, screw loosening, and altered sagittal contour have been encountered.
To analyse the effect of the magnitude of distraction forces on the T1-S1 growth, maximum von Mises stresses on the rods, sagittal contours, and load at the pedicle screw-bone interface and quantify the maximum stresses on the rod for a period of 24 months using different frequencies of distraction in a representative scoliotic spine model.
A representative finite element model of a juvenile scoliotic spine was used to study the effect of magnitude and frequency of distraction on growth rods.
A representative scoliotic model was developed and instrumented using proximal foundation, distal foundation, and rods. Part 1: simulation steps comprised 6 months of growth under various distraction forces to analyze effects of distraction force on the biomechanics of the spine and instrument. Part 2: simulation steps comprised 24 months of growth under various intervals of distraction to analyze effects of distraction interval on the propensity of rod fracture.
Part 1: an optimal distraction force exists for which the growth is sustained with minimum stress on the rod, lower loads at screw-bone interface, and unaltered sagittal contours. Part 2: the stresses on the rods were highest for 12-month distraction (2 distractions in 2 years) and lowest for 2-month distraction (12 distractions in 2 years).
The data and trend suggest that as the distraction forces vary so do the effects on spinal growth. The results of this study also signify the importance of shorter distraction period in reducing the stresses on the rods.
生长棒用于限制脊柱侧弯的进展,同时不限制脊柱生长的机会。然而,已出现诸如棒断裂、螺钉松动和矢状面轮廓改变等主要并发症。
在一个具有代表性的脊柱侧弯模型中,分析牵引力量大小对T1-S1生长、棒上的最大von Mises应力、矢状面轮廓以及椎弓根螺钉-骨界面处的载荷的影响,并使用不同的牵引频率量化24个月期间棒上的最大应力。
使用一个青少年脊柱侧弯的代表性有限元模型来研究牵引大小和频率对生长棒的影响。
建立一个具有代表性的脊柱侧弯模型,并使用近端基础、远端基础和棒进行器械植入。第1部分:模拟步骤包括在各种牵引力量下进行6个月的生长,以分析牵引力量对脊柱和器械生物力学的影响。第2部分:模拟步骤包括在各种牵引间隔下进行24个月的生长,以分析牵引间隔对棒断裂倾向的影响。
第1部分:存在一个最佳牵引力量,在此力量下生长得以维持,棒上的应力最小,螺钉-骨界面处的载荷较低,矢状面轮廓未改变。第2部分:在12个月牵引(2年内2次牵引)时棒上的应力最高,在2个月牵引(2年内12次牵引)时最低。
数据和趋势表明,随着牵引力量的变化,对脊柱生长的影响也会不同。本研究结果还表明缩短牵引期在降低棒上应力方面的重要性。