• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对神经功能受损新生儿的选择性非治疗

Selective nontreatment of neurologically impaired neonates.

作者信息

Weir R F, Bale J F

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

出版信息

Neurol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):807-21.

PMID:2586402
Abstract

We are convinced that a best-interests approach is the best approach to take in making decisions to treat or not to treat disabled young infants. Such an approach acknowledges that there are some medical conditions that are so severe that efforts to sustain the lives of infants having the conditions cannot be said to be in the best interests of those infants. By paying attention to the variables that compose the best-interests approach, decision makers can arrive at decisions not to sustain life that are more easily justifiable than with any other approach.

摘要

我们深信,在决定是否治疗残疾幼儿时,采用符合最佳利益的方法是最佳选择。这种方法承认,有些医疗状况极为严重,维持患有这些状况的婴儿生命的努力不能说是符合这些婴儿的最佳利益的。通过关注构成最佳利益方法的各种变量,决策者能够做出不维持生命的决定,相较于其他任何方法,这些决定更易于得到合理辩护。

相似文献

1
Selective nontreatment of neurologically impaired neonates.对神经功能受损新生儿的选择性非治疗
Neurol Clin. 1989 Nov;7(4):807-21.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn.照料残疾新生儿中的伦理和法律问题。
Clin Perinatol. 1987 Jun;14(2):345-60.
4
A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
Am J Law Med. 1985;11(1):31-78.
5
The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment".
Issues Law Med. 1985 Jul;1(1):15-66.
6
Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants.“宝贝多伊”、国会与各州:挑战针对残障婴儿的联邦治疗标准
Am J Law Med. 1989;15(1):1-60.
7
Dilemmas in the care of impaired infants: effects on nursing and health care.照料残障婴儿的困境:对护理及医疗保健的影响
Neonatal Netw. 1988 Apr;6(5):73-81.
8
Do the "Baby Doe" rules ignore suffering?
Second Opin. 1993 Apr;18(4):101-13.
9
Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
Crit Care Clin. 1986 Jan;2(1):145-59.
10
The sanctity of life, the quality of life and the new 'Baby Doe' law.生命的神圣性、生活质量与新的“宝贝多伊”法案。
Linacre Q. 1985 Aug;52(3):258-70.

引用本文的文献

1
The beginning of human life.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep;12(8):477-83. doi: 10.1007/BF02212909.