Stergiadis Sokratis, Allen Michelle, Chen Xianjiang, Wills David, Yan Tianhai
Sustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agriculture Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute,Large Park, Hillsborough,County DownBT26 6DR,UK.
Finance and Corporate Affairs Division, Biometrics and Information Systems Branch, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute,18a Newforge Lane, Belfast,County AntrimBT9 5PX,UK.
Br J Nutr. 2015 May 28;113(10):1571-84. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515000896. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
Pasture-based ruminant production systems are common in certain areas of the world, but energy evaluation in grazing cattle is performed with equations developed, in their majority, with sheep or cattle fed total mixed rations. The aim of the current study was to develop predictions of metabolisable energy (ME) concentrations in fresh-cut grass offered to non-pregnant non-lactating cows at maintenance energy level, which may be more suitable for grazing cattle. Data were collected from three digestibility trials performed over consecutive grazing seasons. In order to cover a range of commercial conditions and data availability in pasture-based systems, thirty-eight equations for the prediction of energy concentrations and ratios were developed. An internal validation was performed for all equations and also for existing predictions of grass ME. Prediction error for ME using nutrient digestibility was lowest when gross energy (GE) or organic matter digestibilities were used as sole predictors, while the addition of grass nutrient contents reduced the difference between predicted and actual values, and explained more variation. Addition of N, GE and diethyl ether extract (EE) contents improved accuracy when digestible organic matter in DM was the primary predictor. When digestible energy was the primary explanatory variable, prediction error was relatively low, but addition of water-soluble carbohydrates, EE and acid-detergent fibre contents of grass decreased prediction error. Equations developed in the current study showed lower prediction errors when compared with those of existing equations, and may thus allow for an improved prediction of ME in practice, which is critical for the sustainability of pasture-based systems.
以牧场为基础的反刍动物生产系统在世界某些地区很常见,但对放牧牛的能量评估是使用大多数情况下针对饲喂全混合日粮的绵羊或牛所开发的方程来进行的。本研究的目的是针对处于维持能量水平的非妊娠非泌乳奶牛所采食的鲜割草中代谢能(ME)浓度建立预测模型,该模型可能更适用于放牧牛。数据来自于在连续放牧季节进行的三项消化率试验。为了涵盖基于牧场的系统中的一系列商业条件和数据可用性,开发了38个用于预测能量浓度和比率的方程。对所有方程以及现有的牧草ME预测进行了内部验证。当使用总能(GE)或有机物质消化率作为唯一预测因子时,利用养分消化率预测ME的误差最低,而添加牧草养分含量则缩小了预测值与实际值之间的差异,并解释了更多的变异。当以干物质中可消化有机物质作为主要预测因子时,添加氮、GE和乙醚提取物(EE)含量可提高预测准确性。当以可消化能作为主要解释变量时,预测误差相对较低,但添加牧草的水溶性碳水化合物、EE和酸性洗涤纤维含量可降低预测误差。与现有方程相比,本研究中开发的方程显示出更低的预测误差,因此在实际应用中可能有助于改进对ME的预测,这对于基于牧场的系统的可持续性至关重要。