Mautner Kenneth, Malanga Gerard A, Smith Jay, Shiple Brian, Ibrahim Victor, Sampson Steven, Bowen Jay E
Department of PM&R and Orthopedics, Emory Orthopedics and Spine Center, Atlanta, GA.
New Jersey Regenerative Institute LLC, Cedar Knolls, NJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
PM R. 2015 Apr;7(4 Suppl):S53-S59. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.02.005.
Autologous cell therapies including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow concentrate (BMC) are increasingly popular options for soft tissue and joint-related diseases. Despite increased clinical application, conflicting research has been published regarding the efficacy of PRP, and few clinical publications pertaining to BMC are available. Preparations of PRP (and BMC) can vary in many areas, including platelet concentration, number of white blood cells, presence or absence of red blood cells, and activation status of the preparation. The potential effect of PRP characteristics on PRP efficacy is often not well understood by the treating clinician, and PRP characteristics, as well as the volume of PRP delivered, are unfortunately not included in the methods of many published research articles. It is essential to establish a standard reporting system for PRP that facilitates communication and the interpretation and synthesis of scientific investigations. Herein, the authors propose a new PRP classification system reflecting important PRP characteristics based on contemporary literature and recommend adoption of minimal standards for PRP reporting in scientific investigations. Widespread adoption of these recommendations will facilitate interpretation and comparison of clinical studies and promote scientifically based progress in the field of regenerative medicine.
包括富血小板血浆(PRP)和骨髓浓缩物(BMC)在内的自体细胞疗法,对于软组织和关节相关疾病而言,正日益成为热门的治疗选择。尽管临床应用有所增加,但关于PRP疗效的研究结果却相互矛盾,而有关BMC的临床出版物则寥寥无几。PRP(以及BMC)的制备在许多方面可能存在差异,包括血小板浓度、白细胞数量、红细胞的有无以及制剂的激活状态。治疗临床医生通常对PRP特性对PRP疗效的潜在影响了解不足,不幸的是,许多已发表的研究文章在方法中并未包含PRP特性以及所输注PRP的体积。建立一个便于科学研究的交流、解读与综合分析的PRP标准报告系统至关重要。在此,作者基于当代文献提出了一种反映PRP重要特性的新PRP分类系统,并建议在科学研究中采用PRP报告的最低标准。广泛采纳这些建议将有助于临床研究的解读与比较,并推动再生医学领域基于科学的进展。