Akaraphutiporn Ekkapol, Wangdee Chalika
Department of Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Center of Excellence in Biomaterial Engineering in Medical and Health, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Int J Vet Sci Med. 2025 Apr 3;13(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/23144599.2025.2483104. eCollection 2025.
This study compared injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from canine blood, focusing on their cellular content and cytokine profiles to evaluate their suitability for various veterinary clinical applications. Blood samples were collected from 20 client-owned dogs. i-PRF and PRP were prepared using low-speed centrifugation and double centrifugation methods, respectively. Blood cell counts were quantified using automated cell analysers, while growth factors and cytokines were measured using a Luminex assay. The results showed that both i-PRF and PRP significantly reduced red blood cell content compared with whole blood. PRP achieved a 3.81-fold increase in the platelet concentration compared with whole blood, significantly higher than the 1.89-fold increase achieved by i-PRF. PRP also contained significantly higher levels of white blood cells, particularly lymphocytes and monocytes. Growth factor and cytokine profiles between the two products were unexpectedly similar. In conclusion, while PRP demonstrated superior platelet and white blood cell concentrations compared with i-PRF, its preparation process was more complex and time-consuming. Conversely, i-PRF offered the advantages of shorter preparation time and the absence of anticoagulants, making it potentially more suitable for certain clinical applications despite the similarity in growth factor and cytokine profiles between the two products.
本研究比较了源自犬类血液的注射用富血小板纤维蛋白(i-PRF)和富血小板血浆(PRP),重点关注它们的细胞成分和细胞因子谱,以评估它们在各种兽医临床应用中的适用性。从20只客户拥有的犬只采集血样。分别使用低速离心法和双重离心法制备i-PRF和PRP。使用自动细胞分析仪对血细胞计数进行定量,同时使用Luminex检测法测量生长因子和细胞因子。结果显示,与全血相比,i-PRF和PRP均显著降低了红细胞含量。与全血相比,PRP的血小板浓度增加了3.81倍,显著高于i-PRF所实现的1.89倍的增加。PRP还含有显著更高水平的白细胞,尤其是淋巴细胞和单核细胞。两种产品之间的生长因子和细胞因子谱出人意料地相似。总之,虽然与i-PRF相比,PRP显示出更高的血小板和白细胞浓度,但其制备过程更为复杂且耗时。相反,i-PRF具有制备时间短和无需抗凝剂的优点,尽管两种产品的生长因子和细胞因子谱相似,但这使得它可能更适合某些临床应用。