• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

穿戴防爆和化学防护个人装备时,代谢工作率和环境对生理耐受时间的影响。

The effects of metabolic work rate and ambient environment on physiological tolerance times while wearing explosive and chemical personal protective equipment.

作者信息

Costello Joseph T, Stewart Kelly L, Stewart Ian B

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Australia.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:857536. doi: 10.1155/2015/857536. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1155/2015/857536
PMID:25866818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4383354/
Abstract

This study evaluated the physiological tolerance times when wearing explosive and chemical (>35 kg) personal protective equipment (PPE) in simulated environmental extremes across a range of differing work intensities. Twelve healthy males undertook nine trials which involved walking on a treadmill at 2.5, 4, and 5.5 km·h(-1) in the following environmental conditions, 21, 30, and 37°C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT). Participants exercised for 60 min or until volitional fatigue, core temperature reached 39°C, or heart rate exceeded 90% of maximum. Tolerance time, core temperature, skin temperature, mean body temperature, heart rate, and body mass loss were measured. Exercise time was reduced in the higher WBGT environments (WBGT37 < WBGT30 < WBGT21; P < 0.05) and work intensities (5.5 < 4 < 2.5 km·h(-1); P < 0.001). The majority of trials (85/108; 78.7%) were terminated due to participant's heart rate exceeding 90% of their maximum. A total of eight trials (7.4%) lasted the full duration. Only nine (8.3%) trials were terminated due to volitional fatigue and six (5.6%) due to core temperatures in excess of 39°C. These results demonstrate that physiological tolerance times are influenced by the external environment and workload and that cardiovascular strain is the limiting factor to work tolerance when wearing this heavy multilayered PPE.

摘要

本研究评估了在一系列不同工作强度下,于模拟极端环境中穿着防爆和化学防护(>35公斤)个人防护装备(PPE)时的生理耐受时间。12名健康男性进行了9次试验,包括在以下环境条件下,即湿球黑球温度(WBGT)分别为21、30和37°C时,以2.5、4和5.5公里·小时-1的速度在跑步机上行走。参与者运动60分钟或直至自愿疲劳、核心温度达到39°C或心率超过最大值的90%。测量了耐受时间、核心温度、皮肤温度、平均体温、心率和体重减轻情况。在较高的WBGT环境(WBGT37 < WBGT30 < WBGT21;P < 0.05)和工作强度(5.5 < 4 < 2.5公里·小时-1;P < 0.001)下,运动时间缩短。大多数试验(85/108;78.7%)因参与者心率超过其最大值的90%而终止。共有8次试验(7.4%)持续了整个时长。只有9次试验(8.3%)因自愿疲劳而终止,6次试验(5.6%)因核心温度超过39°C而终止。这些结果表明,生理耐受时间受外部环境和工作量的影响,并且在穿着这种厚重的多层PPE时,心血管应变是工作耐受性的限制因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/4383354/6387f6efdce7/BMRI2015-857536.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/4383354/6387f6efdce7/BMRI2015-857536.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df92/4383354/6387f6efdce7/BMRI2015-857536.001.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of metabolic work rate and ambient environment on physiological tolerance times while wearing explosive and chemical personal protective equipment.穿戴防爆和化学防护个人装备时,代谢工作率和环境对生理耐受时间的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:857536. doi: 10.1155/2015/857536. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
2
Inside the 'Hurt Locker': The Combined Effects of Explosive Ordnance Disposal and Chemical Protective Clothing on Physiological Tolerance Time in Extreme Environments.在“拆弹部队”内部:爆炸物处理与化学防护服对极端环境下生理耐受时间的综合影响
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Aug;59(7):922-31. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev029. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
3
Physiological tolerance times while wearing explosive ordnance disposal protective clothing in simulated environmental extremes.在模拟极端环境中穿着爆炸物处理防护服时的生理耐受时间。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e83740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083740. eCollection 2014.
4
Can perceptual indices estimate physiological strain across a range of environments and metabolic workloads when wearing explosive ordnance disposal and chemical protective clothing?在穿着爆炸物处理和化学防护服时,感知指标能否估计一系列环境和代谢工作负荷下的生理应激?
Physiol Behav. 2015 Aug 1;147:71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
Perceived exertion is as effective as the perceptual strain index in predicting physiological strain when wearing personal protective clothing.在预测穿着个人防护装备时的生理应激方面,自觉用力程度与感知应激指数同样有效。
Physiol Behav. 2017 Feb 1;169:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.12.009. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
6
Validity of a noninvasive estimation of deep body temperature when wearing personal protective equipment during exercise and recovery.穿着个人防护装备进行运动和恢复时,非侵入性估计深部体温的有效性。
Mil Med Res. 2019 Jun 14;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40779-019-0208-7.
7
Work tolerance and subjective responses to wearing protective clothing and respirators during physical work.体力劳动期间穿着防护服和呼吸器时的工作耐力及主观反应。
Ergonomics. 1989 Sep;32(9):1111-23. doi: 10.1080/00140138908966878.
8
The effect of physical exertion in chemical and biological personal protective equipment on physiological function and reaction time.体力活动对化学和生物个人防护装备对生理功能和反应时间的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):36-44. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349747.
9
Comparison of a military chemical suit and an industrial usage vapor barrier suit across two thermal environments.在两种热环境下对军用化学防护服和工业用蒸汽阻隔防护服的比较。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1997 Sep;58(9):646-9. doi: 10.1080/15428119791012432.
10
Micro-environment changes inside impermeable protective clothing during a continuous work exposure.连续工作暴露期间不可渗透防护服内的微环境变化。
Ergonomics. 2001 Sep 15;44(11):953-61. doi: 10.1080/00140130110068915.

引用本文的文献

1
Heat strain in chemical protective clothing in hot-humid environment: Effects of clothing thermal properties.湿热环境下化学防护服的热应激:服装热性能的影响
J Cent South Univ. 2021;28(12):3654-3665. doi: 10.1007/s11771-021-4670-5. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
2
Evaluation of a Wearable Non-Invasive Thermometer for Monitoring Ear Canal Temperature during Physically Demanding (Outdoor) Work.评估一种可穿戴的非侵入式耳温计,用于监测体力要求高(户外)工作期间的耳道温度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 4;18(9):4896. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094896.
3
Validity of a noninvasive estimation of deep body temperature when wearing personal protective equipment during exercise and recovery.

本文引用的文献

1
Heat strain evaluation of overt and covert body armour in a hot and humid environment.在炎热潮湿环境中对显性和隐性防弹衣的热应激评估。
Appl Ergon. 2015 Mar;47:11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
2
Excessive occupational heat exposure: a significant ergonomic challenge and health risk for current and future workers.过度的职业热暴露:对当前和未来工人来说是一项重大的人体工程学挑战和健康风险。
Extrem Physiol Med. 2014 Jul 23;3:14. doi: 10.1186/2046-7648-3-14. eCollection 2014.
3
Minimum cost of transport in human running is not ubiquitous.
穿着个人防护装备进行运动和恢复时,非侵入性估计深部体温的有效性。
Mil Med Res. 2019 Jun 14;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40779-019-0208-7.
4
Skin Temperature Measurement Using Contact Thermometry: A Systematic Review of Setup Variables and Their Effects on Measured Values.使用接触式测温法测量皮肤温度:设置变量及其对测量值影响的系统评价
Front Physiol. 2018 Jan 30;9:29. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00029. eCollection 2018.
5
Internal and external cooling methods and their effect on body temperature, thermal perception and dexterity.内部和外部冷却方法及其对体温、热感知和灵巧性的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 22;13(1):e0191416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191416. eCollection 2018.
6
An Overt Chemical Protective Garment Reduces Thermal Strain Compared with a Covert Garment in Warm-Wet but Not Hot-Dry Environments.在温暖潮湿而非炎热干燥的环境中,与隐蔽式防护服相比,开放式化学防护服可减轻热应激。
Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 9;8:913. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00913. eCollection 2017.
7
Heat strain imposed by personal protective ensembles: quantitative analysis using a thermoregulation model.个人防护装备造成的热应激:使用体温调节模型的定量分析
Int J Biometeorol. 2016 Jul;60(7):1065-74. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1100-0. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
人类奔跑的最小成本运输并非无处不在。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 Feb;47(2):307-14. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000421.
4
Three-dimensional interactions of mean body and local skin temperatures in the control of hand and foot blood flows.平均体温与局部皮肤温度在控制手足血流中的三维相互作用。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Aug;114(8):1679-89. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2894-x. Epub 2014 May 14.
5
Where are all the female participants in Sports and Exercise Medicine research?体育与运动医学研究中的女性参与者都去哪儿了?
Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(8):847-51. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.911354. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
6
Physiological tolerance times while wearing explosive ordnance disposal protective clothing in simulated environmental extremes.在模拟极端环境中穿着爆炸物处理防护服时的生理耐受时间。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 21;9(2):e83740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083740. eCollection 2014.
7
Heat strain and hydration status of surface mine blast crew workers.露天煤矿爆破作业人员的热应激与水合状态
J Occup Environ Med. 2014 Apr;56(4):409-14. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000114.
8
Encapsulated environment.封装环境。
Compr Physiol. 2013 Jul;3(3):1363-91. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130002.
9
Physiological strain of next generation combat uniforms with chemical and biological protection: importance of clothing vents.下一代具有化学和生物防护功能的作战服的生理负荷:服装通风口的重要性。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(2):327-37. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.746738. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
10
Physiological responses of Police Officers during job simulations wearing chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear personal protective equipment.警察在穿着化学、生物、放射性和核个人防护装备进行作业模拟时的生理反应。
Ergonomics. 2013;56(1):137-47. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.734335. Epub 2012 Nov 12.