Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病筛查:美国预防服务工作组的系统评价。

Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):765-76. doi: 10.7326/M14-2221.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus could lead to earlier identification and treatment of asymptomatic diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), potentially resulting in improved outcomes.

PURPOSE

To update the 2008 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on diabetes screening in adults.

DATA SOURCES

Cochrane databases and MEDLINE (2007 through October 2014) and relevant studies from previous Task Force reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials; controlled, observational studies; and systematic reviews.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and checked by a second; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In 2 trials, screening for diabetes was associated with no 10-year mortality benefit versus no screening (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.25]). Sixteen trials consistently found that treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes. Most trials of treatment of IFG or IGT found no effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, although lifestyle modification was associated with decreased risk for both outcomes after 23 years in 1 trial. For screen-detected diabetes, 1 trial found no effect of an intensive multifactorial intervention on risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality versus standard control. In diabetes that was not specifically screen-detected, 9 systematic reviews found that intensive glucose control did not reduce risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and results for intensive blood pressure control were inconsistent.

LIMITATION

The review was restricted to English-language articles, and few studies were conducted in screen-detected populations.

CONCLUSION

Screening for diabetes did not improve mortality rates after 10 years of follow-up. More evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of treatments for screen-detected diabetes. Treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

摘要

背景

筛查 2 型糖尿病可更早发现无症状性糖尿病、空腹血糖受损(IFG)或葡萄糖耐量受损(IGT),并进行相应治疗,从而改善预后。

目的

更新 2008 年美国预防服务工作组有关成人糖尿病筛查的综述。

资料来源

Cochrane 数据库和 MEDLINE(2007 年至 2014 年 10 月),以及工作组先前综述中相关研究。

研究选择

随机对照试验、对照观察性研究、系统综述。

资料提取

由 1 名调查员提取资料,另 1 名调查员核对;2 名调查员独立评估研究质量。

资料综合

在 2 项试验中,与未筛查相比,筛查糖尿病并未降低 10 年死亡率(风险比 1.06[95%CI,0.90 至 1.25])。16 项试验一致发现,IFG 或 IGT 的治疗与糖尿病进展延缓相关。IFG 或 IGT 治疗的多数试验未发现全因死亡率或心血管死亡率的影响,但在 1 项试验中,经过 23 年生活方式干预可降低这 2 项结局的风险。对于筛查发现的糖尿病,1 项试验发现强化多因素干预与标准对照相比,对全因或心血管死亡率无影响。对于非特异性筛查发现的糖尿病,9 项系统综述发现强化血糖控制并不能降低全因死亡率或心血管死亡率,强化血压控制的结果也不一致。

局限性

综述仅限于英语文献,且多数研究针对的是筛查人群。

结论

糖尿病筛查未能改善 10 年随访后的死亡率。需要更多证据来确定筛查发现的糖尿病治疗的有效性。IFG 或 IGT 的治疗与糖尿病进展延缓相关。

首要资助来源

美国医疗保健研究与质量署。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验