Hilbert Anja, Hildebrandt Thomas, Agras W Stewart, Wilfley Denise E, Wilson G Terence
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Integrated Research and Treatment Center for Adiposity Diseases, University of Leipzig Medical Center.
Eating and Weight Disorder Program, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):649-54. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000018. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
Analysis of short- and long-term effects of rapid response across 3 different treatments for binge eating disorder (BED).
In a randomized clinical study comparing interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), cognitive-behavioral therapy guided self-help (CBTgsh), and behavioral weight loss (BWL) treatment in 205 adults meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV; APA, 1994) criteria for BED, the predictive value of rapid response, defined as ≥70% reduction in binge eating by Week 4, was determined for remission from binge eating and global eating disorder psychopathology at posttreatment, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups.
Rapid responders in CBTgsh, but not in IPT or BWL, showed significantly greater rates of remission from binge eating than nonrapid responders, which was sustained over the long term. Rapid and nonrapid responders in IPT and rapid responders in CBTgsh showed a greater remission from binge eating than nonrapid responders in CBTgsh and BWL. Rapid responders in CBTgsh showed greater remission from binge eating than rapid responders in BWL. Although rapid responders in all treatments had lower global eating disorder psychopathology than nonrapid responders in the short term, rapid responders in CBTgsh and IPT were more improved than those in BWL and nonrapid responders in each treatment. Rapid responders in BWL did not differ from nonrapid responders in CBTgsh and IPT.
Rapid response is a treatment-specific positive prognostic indicator of sustained remission from binge eating in CBTgsh. Regarding an evidence-based, stepped-care model, IPT, equally efficacious for rapid and nonrapid responders, could be investigated as a second-line treatment in case of nonrapid response to first-line CBTgsh.
分析针对暴食症(BED)的3种不同治疗方法中快速反应的短期和长期效果。
在一项随机临床研究中,对205名符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第4版;DSM-IV;美国心理学会,1994年)中BED标准的成年人进行人际心理治疗(IPT)、认知行为疗法指导自助(CBTgsh)和行为减重(BWL)治疗的比较,确定快速反应(定义为在第4周时暴食行为减少≥70%)对治疗后、6个月、12个月、18个月和24个月随访时暴食行为缓解及整体饮食失调精神病理学的预测价值。
CBTgsh组的快速反应者,而非IPT组或BWL组,与非快速反应者相比,暴食行为缓解率显著更高,且长期维持。IPT组的快速和非快速反应者以及CBTgsh组的快速反应者比CBTgsh组和BWL组的非快速反应者暴食行为缓解程度更大。CBTgsh组的快速反应者比BWL组的快速反应者暴食行为缓解程度更大。虽然所有治疗组的快速反应者在短期内整体饮食失调精神病理学水平均低于非快速反应者,但CBTgsh组和IPT组的快速反应者比BWL组及各治疗组的非快速反应者改善更明显。BWL组的快速反应者与CBTgsh组和IPT组的非快速反应者无差异。
快速反应是CBTgsh中暴食行为持续缓解的特定治疗积极预后指标。对于基于证据的阶梯式护理模式,IPT对快速和非快速反应者同样有效,在对一线CBTgsh无快速反应的情况下,可作为二线治疗进行研究。