• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量新视野:进食障碍评估的新颖和创新方法综述。

New Horizons in Measurement: a Review of Novel and Innovative Approaches to Eating-Disorder Assessment.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Fraser Hall, 1415 Jayhawk Boulevard, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA.

Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Sep 11;19(10):76. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0826-2.

DOI:10.1007/s11920-017-0826-2
PMID:28891029
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Eating disorders are serious mental-health concerns that will affect over 30 million individuals in the USA at some point in their lives. Eating disorders occur across the lifespan, in a variety of ethnicities and races, in both men and women, and across the socioeconomic spectrum. Given the prevalence and severity of eating disorders, it is important that clinicians and researchers have access to appropriate assessment tools to aid in the early identification and treatment referral, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and progress monitoring, and to ensure valid research findings. In this review, we describe novel and innovative assessment tools that were developed within the past 5 years for utilization in research and/or clinical practice with individuals with eating disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

We identified six multidimensional assessments for eating disorders, all of which can be administered online (with some also offering paper-and-pencil versions). Strengths of the measures included good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. However, in part, due to problematic scale construction methods, certain scales had poor discriminant validity and most were developed and validated in mostly female samples. There are promising new eating disorder measures from which to choose; however, many measures continue to be limited by poor discriminant validity and need additional validation prior to incorporation into routine research and clinical practice.

摘要

目的综述

饮食失调是严重的心理健康问题,在美国,一生中会有超过 3000 万人受到影响。饮食失调可发生于整个生命周期,涉及各种族裔和种族、男女,以及社会经济各个阶层。鉴于饮食失调的普遍性和严重性,临床医生和研究人员必须能够使用适当的评估工具,以帮助早期识别和治疗转介、鉴别诊断、治疗计划和进展监测,并确保研究结果有效。在这篇综述中,我们描述了过去 5 年内在研究和/或临床实践中针对饮食失调患者开发的新颖和创新的评估工具。

最近的发现

我们确定了六种多维饮食失调评估工具,均可以在线(部分也提供纸笔版)进行评估。这些评估工具的优点包括良好的内部一致性、重测信度和聚合效度。然而,部分由于量表编制方法存在问题,某些量表的区分效度较差,且大多数都是在主要为女性的样本中开发和验证的。有一些有前途的新的饮食失调评估工具可供选择;然而,许多评估工具仍然存在区分效度较差的问题,需要在纳入常规研究和临床实践之前进行进一步验证。

相似文献

1
New Horizons in Measurement: a Review of Novel and Innovative Approaches to Eating-Disorder Assessment.测量新视野:进食障碍评估的新颖和创新方法综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Sep 11;19(10):76. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0826-2.
2
Psychometric Evaluation of Disordered Eating Measures in Bariatric Surgery Candidates.肥胖症手术候选人饮食失调测量方法的心理测量评估
Obes Surg. 2016 Mar;26(3):563-75. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1780-x.
3
Eating Disorder Inventory-3, validation in Swedish patients with eating disorders, psychiatric outpatients and a normal control sample.《饮食失调问卷-3》在瑞典饮食失调患者、精神科门诊患者及正常对照样本中的效度验证
Nord J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;69(2):142-51. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2014.949305. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
4
The Munich eating and feeding disorder questionnaire (Munich ED-Quest) DSM-5/ICD-10: validity, reliability, sensitivity to change and norms.慕尼黑饮食与喂养障碍问卷(慕尼黑ED-Quest)DSM-5/ICD-10:效度、信度、变化敏感性及常模。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 May;23(3):229-40. doi: 10.1002/erv.2348. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
5
Development and evaluation of the McKnight Risk Factor Survey for assessing potential risk and protective factors for disordered eating in preadolescent and adolescent girls.用于评估青春期前及青春期女孩饮食失调潜在风险和保护因素的麦克奈特风险因素调查问卷的开发与评估。
Int J Eat Disord. 1999 Mar;25(2):195-214. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199903)25:2<195::aid-eat9>3.0.co;2-b.
6
The Chinese version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: An examination of its validation in a sample of female adolescents.耶鲁食物成瘾量表中文版:在女性青少年样本中的效度检验。
Eat Behav. 2015 Aug;18:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 19.
7
Turkish version of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2: Validity and reliability among university students.《直观饮食量表-2》土耳其语版本:大学生中的效度与信度
Appetite. 2017 Jul 1;114:391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
8
Comparative validity of the Internet and paper-and-pencil versions of the Night Eating Questionnaire.互联网版和纸笔版夜间饮食问卷的比较有效性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 May;75:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Repetitive eating questionnaire [Rep(eat)-Q]: Enlightening the concept of grazing and psychometric properties in a Portuguese sample.重复性进食问卷(Rep(eat)-Q):在葡萄牙样本中阐明放牧的概念和心理测量特性。
Appetite. 2017 Oct 1;117:351-358. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
10
Validation of the Italian version of the Compensatory Eating and Behaviors in Response to Alcohol Consumption Scale (CEBRACS).意大利版酒精消费反应中的代偿性饮食与行为量表(CEBRACS)的验证
Eat Behav. 2015 Dec;19:120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Eating disorder measures in a sample of military veterans: A focus on gender, age, and race/ethnicity.在军人样本中进食障碍的测量:重点关注性别、年龄和种族/民族。
Psychol Assess. 2021 Dec;33(12):1226-1238. doi: 10.1037/pas0001050. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Use of online and paper-and-pencil questionnaires to assess the distribution of orthorexia nervosa, muscle dysmorphia and eating disorders among university students: can different approaches lead to different results?使用在线和纸笔问卷评估大学生中神经强迫症、肌肉变形障碍和饮食失调的分布:不同的方法是否会导致不同的结果?
Eat Weight Disord. 2022 Apr;27(3):989-999. doi: 10.1007/s40519-021-01231-3. Epub 2021 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Test-Retest Reliability of Common Measures of Eating Disorder Symptoms in Men Versus Women.男性和女性饮食障碍症状常用测量指标的重测信度比较。
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):419-431. doi: 10.1177/1073191117700267. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
2
Comparative validity of the Internet and paper-and-pencil versions of the Night Eating Questionnaire.互联网版和纸笔版夜间饮食问卷的比较有效性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2017 May;75:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Socioeconomic Correlates of Eating Disorder Symptoms in an Australian Population-Based Sample.
澳大利亚基于人群样本中饮食失调症状的社会经济关联因素
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):e0170603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170603. eCollection 2017.
4
The Prevalence of Past 12-Month and Lifetime DSM-IV Eating Disorders by BMI Category in US Men and Women.按体重指数分类统计的美国男性和女性过去12个月及终生的DSM-IV饮食失调患病率
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 May;25(3):165-171. doi: 10.1002/erv.2503. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
5
Prevalence and treatment of eating disorders among Hispanics/Latino Americans in the United States.美国西班牙裔/拉丁裔美国人饮食失调症的患病率与治疗情况
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;29(6):378-82. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000277.
6
An Interactive, Graphical Tool for Retrospectively Assessing Symptom Frequency and Severity: An Illustration With Eating Disorder Behaviors, Body Weight, and Stress.用于回顾性评估症状频率和严重程度的交互式图形工具:以饮食障碍行为、体重和压力为例。
Assessment. 2017 Oct;24(7):835-852. doi: 10.1177/1073191116668629. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
7
Evolving eating disorder psychopathology: conceptualising muscularity-oriented disordered eating.不断演变的进食障碍病理心理学:概念化以肌肉为导向的进食障碍。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 May;208(5):414-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.168427.
8
E-Health Interventions for Eating Disorders: Emerging Findings, Issues, and Opportunities.饮食失调的电子健康干预措施:新发现、问题与机遇
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016 Apr;18(4):42. doi: 10.1007/s11920-016-0673-6.
9
Mortality in eating disorders - results of a large prospective clinical longitudinal study.饮食失调症的死亡率——一项大型前瞻性临床纵向研究的结果
Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Apr;49(4):391-401. doi: 10.1002/eat.22501. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
10
The impact of early symptom change and therapeutic alliance on treatment outcome in cognitive-behavioural therapy for eating disorders.早期症状变化和治疗联盟对认知行为疗法治疗进食障碍的疗效的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Oct;73:165-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 19.