Yinon Y, Ashwal E, Weisz B, Chayen B, Schiff E, Lipitz S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;46(6):670-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.14879. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
To compare the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and bipolar cord coagulation (BPC) methods for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic (MC) twin gestations and to determine risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome.
This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients with complicated MC twin pregnancy who underwent selective reduction in a single tertiary care center between 2000 and 2014. We compared the two methods with respect to various demographic, obstetric and perinatal outcome variables.
Fifty-three selective terminations in complicated MC twin gestations were performed, 36 by RFA and 17 by BPC. Each technique resulted in a similar overall survival rate of the remaining twin (88.9% vs 76.5%, P = 0.25). Likewise, the mean procedure-to-delivery interval, the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery < 37, < 34, < 32 and < 28 weeks and the rate of preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes did not differ between the groups. However, among patients in the BPC group, there was a trend towards earlier gestational age at delivery (31.3 vs 35.0 weeks, P = 0.09) compared with in the RFA group. There was selective reduction by RFA due to selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR) in 19 cases, 17 (89.5%) of which survived perinatally, with delivery at a median gestational age of 37 weeks. There were no significant differences in perinatal outcome, irrespective of whether the procedure was performed pre- or post-viability. All post-viability reductions, most of which were by RFA, resulted in perinatal survival.
Perinatal outcome of complicated MC twin gestations undergoing selective feticide seems to be similar regardless of whether termination is by BPC or RFA. Nevertheless, RFA appears to be particularly useful in MC twins complicated by sIUGR and in cases requiring selective reduction beyond the age of viability.
比较射频消融术(RFA)和双极脐带凝固术(BPC)在复杂单绒毛膜(MC)双胎妊娠中进行选择性减胎的效果,并确定不良妊娠结局的危险因素。
这是一项对2000年至2014年期间在单一三级医疗中心接受选择性减胎的所有复杂MC双胎妊娠患者的回顾性队列研究。我们比较了两种方法在各种人口统计学、产科和围产期结局变量方面的情况。
对复杂MC双胎妊娠进行了53次选择性终止妊娠,其中36次采用RFA,17次采用BPC。每种技术导致剩余胎儿的总体存活率相似(88.9%对76.5%,P = 0.25)。同样,两组之间的平均手术至分娩间隔、<37周、<34周、<32周和<28周的自发早产率以及胎膜早破率没有差异。然而,与RFA组相比,BPC组患者的分娩孕周有提前的趋势(31.3对35.0周,P = 0.09)。19例因选择性胎儿生长受限(sIUGR)采用RFA进行选择性减胎,其中17例(89.5%)围产期存活,中位分娩孕周为37周。无论手术是在胎儿存活之前还是之后进行,围产期结局均无显著差异。所有在胎儿存活后进行的减胎手术,大多数采用RFA,均导致围产期存活。
无论采用BPC还是RFA进行终止妊娠,复杂MC双胎妊娠接受选择性减胎的围产期结局似乎相似。然而,RFA在合并sIUGR的MC双胎以及需要在胎儿存活年龄之后进行选择性减胎的病例中似乎特别有用。