Castel Amanda D, Tang Wenze, Peterson James, Mikre Meriam, Parenti David, Elion Richard, Wood Angela, Kuo Irene, Willis Sarah, Allen Sean, Kulie Paige, Ikwuemesi Ifeoma, Dassie Kossia, Dunning Jillian, Saafir-Callaway Brittani, Greenberg Alan
*Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC; †Division of Infectious Diseases, George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC; ‡Whitman Walker Health, Washington, DC; §Family Medical and Counseling Services, Inc., Washington, DC; and ‖District of Columbia Department of Health, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis, STD, TB Administration, Washington, DC.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015 May 1;69 Suppl 1(0 1):S44-55. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000575.
Indicators for determining one's status on the HIV care continuum are often measured using clinical and surveillance data but do not typically assess patient perspectives. We assessed patient-reported care status along the care continuum and whether it differed from medical records and surveillance data.
Between June 2013 and October 2014, a convenience sample of clinic-attending HIV-infected persons was surveyed regarding care-seeking behaviors and self-perceived status along the care continuum. Participant responses were matched to DC Department of Health surveillance data and clinic records. Participants' care patterns were classified using Health Resources Services Administration-defined care status: in care (IC), sporadic care (SC), or out of care (OOC). Semistructured qualitative interviews were analyzed using an open coding process to elucidate relevant themes regarding participants' perceptions of engagement in care.
Of 169 participants, most were male participants (64%) and black (72%), with a mean age of 50.7 years. Using self-reported visit patterns, 115 participants (68%) were consistent with being IC, 33 (20%) SC, and 21 (12%) OOC. Among OOC participants, 52% perceived themselves to be fully engaged in HIV care. In the previous year, among OOC participants, 71% reported having a non-HIV-related medical visit and 90% reported current antiretroviral use. Qualitatively, most SC and OOC persons did not see their HIV providers regularly because they felt healthy.
Participants' perceptions of HIV care engagement differed from actual care receipt as measured by surveillance and clinical records. Measures of care engagement may need to be reconsidered as persons not receiving regular HIV care maybe accessing other health care and HIV medications elsewhere.
确定某人在HIV治疗连续过程中所处状态的指标通常是通过临床和监测数据来衡量的,但通常不会评估患者的观点。我们评估了患者报告的治疗连续过程中的治疗状态,以及它是否与病历和监测数据有所不同。
在2013年6月至2014年10月期间,对前来诊所就诊的HIV感染者进行了便利抽样调查,询问他们在治疗连续过程中的就医行为和自我感知状态。将参与者的回答与华盛顿特区卫生部的监测数据和诊所记录进行匹配。参与者的治疗模式根据卫生资源与服务管理局定义的治疗状态进行分类:接受治疗(IC)、间断治疗(SC)或未接受治疗(OOC)。使用开放编码过程对半结构化定性访谈进行分析,以阐明有关参与者对参与治疗的看法的相关主题。
169名参与者中,大多数为男性(64%)且为黑人(72%),平均年龄为50.7岁。根据自我报告的就诊模式,115名参与者(68%)符合接受治疗状态,33名(20%)为间断治疗,21名(12%)为未接受治疗。在未接受治疗的参与者中,52%认为自己完全参与了HIV治疗。在前一年,在未接受治疗的参与者中,71%报告进行过非HIV相关的医疗就诊,90%报告目前正在使用抗逆转录病毒药物。从定性角度来看,大多数间断治疗和未接受治疗的人没有定期去看HIV治疗医生,因为他们感觉自己很健康。
参与者对HIV治疗参与度的看法与通过监测和临床记录衡量的实际治疗接受情况有所不同。由于未接受定期HIV治疗的人可能在其他地方获得其他医疗保健和HIV药物,因此可能需要重新考虑治疗参与度的衡量标准。