Hart-Malloy Rachel, Brown Shakara, Bogucki Kathleen, Tesoriero James
a New York State Department of Health , AIDS Institute , Albany , NY , USA.
b Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics , University at Albany, State University of New York , Rensselaer , NY , USA.
AIDS Care. 2018 Mar;30(3):391-396. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1363851. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
To end the HIV/AIDS epidemic, innovative strategies are needed to improve outcomes along the HIV care continuum. Data-to-Care is a public health strategy whereby HIV surveillance data are used to identify people living with HIV/AIDS for linkage to, or re-engagement in HIV medical care. Three main approaches to Data-to-Care are defined by where persons out of care are identified and where outreach activities are initiated: the Health Department level, the Healthcare Provider level, or a combination of the two (Combination Model). The purpose of this evaluation was to compare successes and challenges for two Data-to-Care models implemented in New York State between 1 January 2015 and 1 September 2016: a Health Department Model, and a Combination Model. The Health Department Model identifies persons presumed to be out of care based on an absence of HIV laboratory tests within the states surveillance system alone, and the Combination Model identifies individuals based on both an absence of a medical provider visit at a partnering health center, and an absence of HIV laboratory tests in the surveillance system. Only counties served by partnering health centers were included in this evaluation. In the Health Department Model, 348 out of 1352 (26%) surveillance identified individuals were truly out of care; of those, re-linkage success was 78%. In the Combination Model, 19 out of 51 (37%) individuals were truly out of care; of those, re-linkage success was 63%. The proportion of cases truly out of care was significantly higher for the Combination Model than the Health Department Model (p-value: 0.08). Both models were successful in re-linking a high proportion of individuals back to care, though the efficiency of identifying individuals who are truly out of care remains an area in need of further refinement for both models.
为终结艾滋病毒/艾滋病流行,需要创新策略来改善艾滋病毒护理连续过程中的治疗效果。数据促护理是一项公共卫生策略,即利用艾滋病毒监测数据来识别艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者,以便将其与艾滋病毒医疗护理相联系或使其重新接受护理。数据促护理的三种主要方法是根据失访者的识别地点和外展活动的启动地点来定义的:卫生部门层面、医疗服务提供者层面或两者结合(联合模式)。本评估的目的是比较2015年1月1日至2016年9月1日在纽约州实施的两种数据促护理模式的成功经验和挑战:卫生部门模式和联合模式。卫生部门模式仅根据州监测系统内缺乏艾滋病毒实验室检测来识别推定失访者,而联合模式则根据在合作的健康中心没有就诊记录以及监测系统中没有艾滋病毒实验室检测来识别个体。本评估仅纳入了由合作健康中心服务的县。在卫生部门模式中,1352名经监测识别出的个体中有348名(26%)确实失访;其中,重新联系成功的比例为78%。在联合模式中,51名个体中有19名(37%)确实失访;其中,重新联系成功的比例为63%。联合模式中真正失访的病例比例显著高于卫生部门模式(p值:0.08)。两种模式都成功地使很大比例的个体重新接受了护理,不过对于两种模式而言,识别真正失访个体的效率仍是一个需要进一步完善的领域。