van den Broek T A, Rauwerda J A, Kuijper C F, van Rij G L, Bakker F C
Department of Surgery, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neth J Surg. 1989 Oct;41(5):104-7.
The increase of deep venous reconstructive surgery necessitates reliable tests for evaluation of the results, which requires quantization of the expelled volume. This could only be done with invasive measurements, but now it seems possible to calibrate photoelectric cells, and quantize the results. Nineteen limbs of patients with deep venous disease and seven limbs of healthy volunteers were evaluated, with methods known from the literature. In addition to measurements in standing position, these methods were used in the more patient-friendly sitting position. Invasively and noninvasively measured recovery times correlated well in the standing (R = 0.83) and in the sitting position (R = 0.86). However, the quantization of expelled volume did not significantly correlate. Also, the differences between expelled volume of controls and patients were only significant with invasive measurements in the standing position (P = 0.006) as well as in the sitting position (P = 0.004). The differences were not significant with the noninvasive method. In our opinion, photoelectric cells still do not offer an alternative for invasive measurements in the evaluation of results after venous reconstructive surgery.
深静脉重建手术的增加使得有必要进行可靠的测试来评估结果,这需要对排出量进行量化。这只能通过侵入性测量来完成,但现在似乎可以校准光电管并对结果进行量化。我们采用文献中已知的方法对19例患有深静脉疾病患者的肢体和7例健康志愿者的肢体进行了评估。除了在站立位测量外,这些方法还用于更方便患者的坐位。在站立位(R = 0.83)和坐位(R = 0.86)时,侵入性和非侵入性测量的恢复时间相关性良好。然而,排出量的量化没有显著相关性。此外,对照组和患者排出量之间的差异仅在站立位(P = 0.006)以及坐位(P = 0.004)的侵入性测量中有显著意义。非侵入性方法的差异不显著。我们认为,在评估静脉重建手术后的结果时,光电管仍不能替代侵入性测量。