LaPrade Christopher M, Dornan Grant J, Granan Lars-Petter, LaPrade Robert F, Engebretsen Lars
Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, CO, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1591-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546515577364. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
While the effects of concurrent meniscal resection and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are known to decrease patient outcomes and increase the rate of osteoarthritis over the long term, overall short-term patient functional outcomes in a large cohort of patients are not well known.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the preoperative and 2-year postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores after ACLR with and without meniscal injury. The hypothesis was that, in comparison with an isolated ACLR, patients with a medial meniscal (MM) or lateral meniscal (LM) resection with an ACLR would have significantly decreased 2-year postoperative KOOS outcomes, while those with an ACLR with an MM or LM repair would be indistinguishable from isolated ACLR.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
The Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry (NKLR) was used to evaluate outcomes for a total of 4691 patients with primary ACLR. The KOOS scoring system was used to evaluate patients on 5 subscales (Pain, Other Symptoms, Activities of Daily Life [ADL], Sport and Recreation Function, and Quality of Life [QoL]) at time of surgery and at 2-year postoperative follow-up. Patients with isolated ACLR and ACLR with LM repair, LM resection, MM repair, or MM resection were compared using multiple linear regression modeling.
Preoperatively, in comparison with isolated ACLR, patients who had an ACLR with either an MM repair or MM resection had significantly lower scores for all KOOS subscores, and LM repair had significantly decreased scores on the Other Symptoms, Pain, and ADL subscales. Postoperatively, in comparison with isolated ACLR, 2-year KOOS outcomes were not significantly different between patients with ACLR and LM repair, MM resection, or LM resection; however, those with MM repair had significantly lower scores on the Other Symptoms and QoL subscales.
Patients with ACLR with meniscal resections do not exhibit decreased clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. It is recommended that clinicians follow patients with ACLR and concurrent meniscal treatment for longer than 2 years postoperatively.
虽然已知同时进行半月板切除术和前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)会降低患者的远期预后,并增加骨关节炎的发生率,但大量患者的总体短期功能预后尚不清楚。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是比较有或没有半月板损伤的患者在ACLR术前和术后2年的膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)分量表评分。假设是,与单纯ACLR相比,ACLR联合内侧半月板(MM)或外侧半月板(LM)切除术的患者术后2年KOOS评分会显著降低,而ACLR联合MM或LM修复术的患者与单纯ACLR患者无差异。
队列研究;证据等级,2级。
使用挪威膝关节韧带注册中心(NKLR)评估4691例原发性ACLR患者的预后。采用KOOS评分系统在手术时和术后2年随访时对患者的5个分量表(疼痛、其他症状、日常生活活动[ADL]、运动和娱乐功能以及生活质量[QoL])进行评估。使用多元线性回归模型比较单纯ACLR患者以及ACLR联合LM修复、LM切除、MM修复或MM切除的患者。
术前,与单纯ACLR相比,ACLR联合MM修复或MM切除的患者所有KOOS子评分均显著较低,而LM修复的患者在其他症状、疼痛和ADL分量表上的评分显著降低。术后,与单纯ACLR相比,ACLR联合LM修复、MM切除或LM切除的患者2年KOOS评分无显著差异;然而,MM修复的患者在其他症状和QoL分量表上的评分显著较低。
ACLR联合半月板切除术的患者术后2年临床预后未降低。建议临床医生对ACLR联合半月板治疗的患者术后随访时间超过2年。