Szőcs Gyula Ferenc, Váncsa Szilárd, Agócs Gergely, Hegyi Péter, Matis Dóra, Pánics Gergely, Bejek Zoltán, Hangody György Márk
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Uzsoki Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.
Centre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Jul 25;48:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.07.004. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Currently, it is advised to perform meniscal repair instead of meniscectomy in certain cases of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the level of evidence is low. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of meniscectomy and meniscus repair in addition to ACLR.
The systematic search was conducted in three online databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane) from inception until October 2021 for the literature on primary ACLR and concomitant meniscal surgery. Eligible studies compared the following outcomes between meniscal repair and meniscectomy groups: the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and KT-arthrometer examinations. Lastly, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) from the change between pre- and post-intervention values.
Of 10,565 studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria, with a follow-up between 6 and 43 months. We found no difference when comparing the KOOS subscale changes-only in the KOOS pain subscale (MD = -1.6; CI: -2.48, -0.72). However, these results were not clinically significant. We analyzed the lateral and media meniscal injuries separately and concluded the same results regarding KOOS changes. We found no significant differences in the Lysholm score change (MD = -2.61; CI: -5.51, 0.29), changes in IKDC score (MD = 1.08; CI: -4.05, 6.21) or the change for the KT-arthrometer side-to-side difference (MD = -0.50; CI: -1.06, 0.06).
Based on our result, we did not find a clinically significant difference between meniscus repair and meniscectomy during primary ACLR regarding patient-reported outcomes in a short-term follow-up.
Our research supports the prompt integration of findings into clinical practice for treating meniscus injuries during ACL reconstruction. We recommend considering both meniscus repair and meniscectomy, as the available data indicate their effectiveness. Further studies are necessary to assess the long-term impacts, particularly on osteoarthritis, and to identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from each technique.
目前,对于某些初次前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)病例,建议进行半月板修复而非半月板切除术。然而,证据水平较低。因此,本研究旨在比较ACLR联合半月板切除术和半月板修复术的疗效。
在三个在线数据库(EMBASE、MEDLINE和Cochrane)中进行系统检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2021年10月,以获取有关初次ACLR及同期半月板手术的文献。符合条件的研究比较了半月板修复组和半月板切除组之间的以下结果:膝关节损伤和骨关节炎疗效评分(KOOS)、Lysholm评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分以及KT关节测量仪检查结果。最后,我们根据干预前后值的变化计算了合并平均差(MDs)及95%置信区间(CIs)。
在10565项研究中,22项符合纳入标准,随访时间为6至43个月。比较KOOS子量表变化时,我们发现仅在KOOS疼痛子量表上存在差异(MD = -1.6;CI:-2.48,-0.72)。然而,这些结果在临床上并不显著。我们分别分析了外侧和内侧半月板损伤情况,得出了关于KOOS变化的相同结果。我们发现Lysholm评分变化(MD = -2.61;CI:-5.51,0.29)、IKDC评分变化(MD = 1.08;CI:-4.05,6.21)或KT关节测量仪双侧差异变化(MD = -0.50;CI:-1.06,0.06)均无显著差异。
根据我们的结果,在短期随访中,就患者报告的结果而言,我们未发现初次ACLR期间半月板修复和半月板切除术之间存在临床上的显著差异。
我们的研究支持将研究结果迅速整合到临床实践中,用于治疗ACL重建期间的半月板损伤。我们建议同时考虑半月板修复和半月板切除术,因为现有数据表明了它们的有效性。有必要进行进一步研究以评估长期影响,特别是对骨关节炎的影响,并确定可能从每种技术中获益最大的患者亚组。