• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致命的吸引力:对转基因食品反对的直观诉求。

Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Plant Systems Biology, VIB, 9052 Ghent, Belgium; Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jul;20(7):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011
PMID:25868652
Abstract

Public opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) remains strong. By contrast, studies demonstrate again and again that GM crops make a valuable contribution to the development of a sustainable type of agriculture. The discrepancy between public opinion and the scientific evidence requires an explanation. We argue that intuitive expectations about the world render the human mind vulnerable to particular misrepresentations of GMOs. We explain how the involvement of particular intuitions accounts for the popularity, persistence, and typical features of GM opposition and tackle possible objections to our approach. To conclude, we discuss the implications for science education, science communication, and the environmental movement.

摘要

公众对转基因生物(GMO)的反对仍然强烈。相比之下,研究一再表明,转基因作物为可持续农业的发展做出了有价值的贡献。公众意见与科学证据之间的差异需要解释。我们认为,人们对世界的直观期望使人们的思维容易受到对 GMO 的特定误解。我们解释了特定直觉的参与如何解释了 GM 反对的流行、持续存在和典型特征,并解决了对我们方法的可能反对意见。最后,我们讨论了这对科学教育、科学传播和环境运动的影响。

相似文献

1
Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition.致命的吸引力:对转基因食品反对的直观诉求。
Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jul;20(7):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
2
Hidden Attraction: Empirical Rationality in GMO Opposition.隐藏的吸引力:转基因生物反对中的经验理性。
Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Feb;21(2):91. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
3
Opposition to transgenic technologies: ideology, interests and collective action frames.对转基因技术的反对:意识形态、利益与集体行动框架
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 Jun;9(6):458-63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2338.
4
Co-existence of agricultural production systems.农业生产系统的共存。
Trends Biotechnol. 2006 May;24(5):198-200. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
5
Government regulation and public opposition create high additional costs for field trials with GM crops in Switzerland.政府监管和公众反对给瑞士的转基因作物田间试验带来了高昂的额外成本。
Transgenic Res. 2011 Dec;20(6):1227-34. doi: 10.1007/s11248-011-9486-x. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
6
Genetic engineering in agriculture and corporate engineering in public debate: risk, public relations, and public debate over genetically modified crops.农业中的基因工程与公共辩论中的企业工程:关于转基因作物的风险、公共关系及公共辩论
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005 Oct-Dec;11(4):428-36. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2005.11.4.428.
7
Genetically modified abominations? Widespread opposition to GMOs might have deep-seated cultural causes.基因改造的怪物?公众对转基因生物的广泛反对可能有其深层的文化原因。
EMBO Rep. 2009 Nov;10(11):1187-90. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.230. Epub 2009 Oct 23.
8
Environmental risk assessment in GMO analysis.转基因生物分析中的环境风险评估。
Riv Biol. 2008 May-Aug;101(2):215-46.
9
Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health.美国对转基因生物的管理:科学、法律与公共卫生
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Apr;96(6):1851-5. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7523. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Controversy over genetically modified organisms: the governing laws and regulations.转基因生物的争议:管理法律法规
Qual Assur. 2000 Jan-Mar;8(1):33-6. doi: 10.1080/105294100753209174.

引用本文的文献

1
Overconfidence in nutritional knowledge is linked to unnecessary gluten-free consumption.对营养知识的过度自信与不必要的无麸质食品消费有关。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19691. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04112-2.
2
Mutation of a gene with PWWP domain confers salt tolerance in rice.具有PWWP结构域的基因发生突变可赋予水稻耐盐性。
Plant Mol Biol. 2025 May 6;115(3):63. doi: 10.1007/s11103-025-01581-x.
3
Building Governance & Coordination Across Applications.跨应用程序构建治理与协调
J Law Med Ethics. 2024;52(3):534-552. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.129. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
4
A Tempered Rationalism for a Tempered Yuck Factor-Using Disgust in Bioethics.一种针对适度厌恶因素的适度理性主义——在生物伦理学中运用厌恶情绪
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Mar 28;16(4):575-594. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00278-x. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Machine culture.机器文化。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1855-1868. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01742-2. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
6
U.S. consumer support for genetically modified foods: Time trends and assessments of four GM attributes.美国消费者对转基因食品的支持:时间趋势和对四种转基因属性的评估。
GM Crops Food. 2023 Dec 31;14(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2023.2278683. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
7
Obstacles to the spread of unintuitive beliefs.非直观信念传播的障碍。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Oct 14;1:e10. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.10. eCollection 2019.
8
Governing biotechnology to provide safety and security and address ethical, legal, and social implications.管理生物技术以确保安全,并应对伦理、法律和社会影响。
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 11;13:1052371. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1052371. eCollection 2022.
9
Public perception of plant gene technologies worldwide in the light of food security.全球公众对植物基因技术的看法与粮食安全息息相关。
GM Crops Food. 2022 Dec 31;13(1):218-241. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2022.2111946.
10
"Trust Me, I'm a Scientist": How Philosophy of Science Can Help Explain Why Science Deserves Primacy in Dealing with Societal Problems.“相信我,我是科学家”:科学哲学如何有助于解释为何科学在解决社会问题方面应占据首要地位。
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2022;31(5):1141-1154. doi: 10.1007/s11191-022-00373-9. Epub 2022 Aug 17.