• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国对转基因生物的管理:科学、法律与公共卫生

Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health.

作者信息

Yang Y Tony, Chen Brian

机构信息

College of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22020, USA.

Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

出版信息

J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Apr;96(6):1851-5. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7523. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1002/jsfa.7523
PMID:26536836
Abstract

Controversy surrounds the production and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Proponents argue that GMO food sources represent the only viable solution to food shortages in an ever-growing global population. Science reports no harm from GMO use and consumption so far. Opponents fear the potentially negative impact that GMO development and use could have on the environment and consumers, and are concerned about the lack of data on the long-term effects of GMO use. We discuss the development of GMO food sources, the history of legislation and policy for the labeling requirements of GMO food products, and the health, environmental, and legal rationale for and against GMO food labeling. The Food and Drug Administration regulates food with GMOs within a coordinated framework of federal agencies. Despite mounting scientific evidence that GMO foods are substantially equivalent to traditionally bred food sources, debate remains over the appropriateness of GMO food labeling. In fact, food manufacturers have mounted a First Amendment challenge against Vermont's passage of a law that requires GMO labeling. Mandatory GMO labeling is not supported by science. Compulsory GMO labels may not only hinder the development of agricultural biotechnology, but may also exacerbate the misconception that GMOs endanger people's health.

摘要

转基因生物(GMOs)的生产和消费存在争议。支持者认为,转基因食品来源是不断增长的全球人口应对粮食短缺的唯一可行解决方案。到目前为止,科学报告称转基因生物的使用和消费没有危害。反对者担心转基因生物的开发和使用可能对环境和消费者产生潜在的负面影响,并对缺乏转基因生物使用长期影响的数据表示担忧。我们讨论了转基因食品来源的发展、转基因食品标签要求的立法和政策历史,以及支持和反对转基因食品标签的健康、环境和法律依据。美国食品药品监督管理局在联邦机构的协调框架内对含有转基因生物的食品进行监管。尽管越来越多的科学证据表明转基因食品与传统培育的食品来源基本等同,但关于转基因食品标签的适当性仍存在争议。事实上,食品制造商已依据美国宪法第一修正案对佛蒙特州通过的一项要求转基因食品标签的法律提出质疑。转基因食品强制标签并无科学依据。强制转基因食品标签不仅可能阻碍农业生物技术的发展,还可能加剧人们认为转基因生物危害健康的误解。

相似文献

1
Governing GMOs in the USA: science, law and public health.美国对转基因生物的管理:科学、法律与公共卫生
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Apr;96(6):1851-5. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7523. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
2
Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms.与食用转基因生物获得的食品相关的公共卫生问题。
Biotechnol Annu Rev. 2004;10:85-122. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(04)10004-5.
3
GMOs, genetically modified organisms or genuinely mixed opinions? A reasonable Consumer’s understanding of the terms "GMO" and "non-GMO," and the struggle to set a Standard. .转基因生物,是真正经过基因改造的生物还是众说纷纭的观点?消费者对“转基因”和“非转基因”术语的合理理解,以及制定标准的艰难过程。
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2017;48(1):221-48.
4
Consumer perception of genetically modified organisms and sources of information.消费者对转基因生物的认知及信息来源。
Adv Nutr. 2015 Nov 13;6(6):842-51. doi: 10.3945/an.115.008870. Print 2015 Nov.
5
GMO Food Labels Do Not Affect College Student Food Selection, Despite Negative Attitudes towards GMOs.转基因食品标签不会影响大学生的食物选择,尽管他们对转基因食品持负面态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1761. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041761.
6
A New Age of Evolution: Protecting the Consumer's Moral and Legal Right to Know through the Clear and Transparent Labeling of All Genetically Modified Foods.进化的新时代:通过对所有转基因食品进行清晰透明的标签标注来保护消费者知晓的道德和合法权利。
J Law Health. 2019;33(1):17-46.
7
Controversy over genetically modified organisms: the governing laws and regulations.转基因生物的争议:管理法律法规
Qual Assur. 2000 Jan-Mar;8(1):33-6. doi: 10.1080/105294100753209174.
8
Exploring the GMO narrative through labeling: strategies, products, and politics.通过标签探索转基因生物的叙述:策略、产品和政治。
GM Crops Food. 2024 Dec 31;15(1):51-66. doi: 10.1080/21645698.2024.2318027. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
9
Regulatory science requirements of labeling of genetically modified food.转基因食品标签的监管科学要求。
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2018 May;38(3):386-393. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1356804. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
10
"You Say Tomato, I Say Solanum Lycopersicum Containing Beta-ionone and Phenylacetaldehyde": an Analysis of Connecticut's GMO Labeling Legislation.
Food Drug Law J. 2014;69(3):471-90, ii-iii.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the adoption and application of the Namibian biosafety labelling regulations and determining their impact on Namibian food and feed importers.评估纳米比亚生物安全标签法规的采用和应用情况,并确定其对纳米比亚食品和饲料进口商的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jul 6;11:1224992. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1224992. eCollection 2023.
2
Labeling of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods in Peru: Current Dogma and Insights of the Regulatory and Legal Statutes.秘鲁转基因食品的标签:现行准则及监管与法律法规解读
Int J Food Sci. 2022 May 12;2022:3489785. doi: 10.1155/2022/3489785. eCollection 2022.
3
Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot.
通过使用聊天机器人提供反驳观点来扩大交互式论证的规模。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Apr;6(4):579-592. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01271-w. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
4
Exploring the landscape of livestock 'Facts'.探索家畜“事实”的全貌。
Glob Food Sec. 2020 Jun;25:100329. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100329.
5
The trouble with collective nouns for genome editing.
Mamm Genome. 2017 Aug;28(7-8):365-366. doi: 10.1007/s00335-017-9707-6. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
6
Finding the Needle in the Haystack-the Use of Microfluidic Droplet Technology to Identify Vitamin-Secreting Lactic Acid Bacteria.从干草堆中找到针——利用微流控液滴技术鉴定产维生素乳酸菌。
mBio. 2017 May 30;8(3):e00526-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00526-17.