Bentham James R, Baird Christopher W, Porras Deigo P, Rathod Rahul H, Marshall Audrey C
Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, and Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;149(6):1502-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.02.046. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
To compare early postoperative outcomes, angiographic, and intervention findings and 1-year survival between 2 groups of infant patients: those receiving a standard right-ventricle-to-pulmonary-artery (RV-PA) conduit versus a ring-reinforced RV-PA conduit, in undergoing Norwood stage-1 surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The technique of using such a ring-reinforced graft, placed through a limited ventriculotomy, has theoretic advantages in preserving right ventricular function, compared with the standard technique of RV-PA conduit creation.
This retrospective cohort study was performed between July 2006 and July 2013. A total of 87 patients with HLHS underwent Norwood stage-1 surgery during this period; 48 received a standard nonreinforced RV-PA conduit; 39 received a ring-reinforced conduit. Primary and secondary outcomes were survival and need for cardiac reintervention up to age 12 months.
No difference was found in transplant-free survival by age 12 months (87% ring-reinforced vs 73% nonreinforced, P = .12). The group with the nonreinforced, versus ring-reinforced, grafts had more interventions in the first year (69% vs 35%, respectively; P < .01). Before stage 2, the pulmonary artery pulse pressure was greater in the group with ring-reinforced grafts (9.1 ± 4.1 vs 4.8 ± 3.1 mm Hg, P < .001), with no difference in mean pressure (15.2 ± 3.32 vs 14.3 ± 3.48 mm Hg, P = .27). The corrected pulmonary artery index (Nakata) was greater in the group with ring-reinforced grafts (213 ± 76 vs 134 ± 68 mm(2)/m(2), P < .0001).
A ring-reinforced conduit is associated with reduced intervention, as well as higher pulse pressures and improved pulmonary artery growth, in infants undergoing stage-1 palliation for HLHS.
比较两组接受诺伍德一期手术治疗左心发育不全综合征(HLHS)的婴儿患者的术后早期结果、血管造影及介入检查结果和1年生存率:一组接受标准右心室至肺动脉(RV-PA)导管,另一组接受带环加固的RV-PA导管。与标准的RV-PA导管制作技术相比,通过有限的心室切开术放置这种带环加固移植物的技术在保留右心室功能方面具有理论优势。
本回顾性队列研究于2006年7月至2013年7月进行。在此期间,共有87例HLHS患者接受了诺伍德一期手术;48例接受标准的未加固RV-PA导管;39例接受带环加固导管。主要和次要结局为12个月龄时的生存率和心脏再次介入治疗的需求。
12个月龄时无移植生存率无差异(带环加固组为87%,未加固组为73%,P = 0.12)。未加固移植物组与带环加固移植物组相比,第一年的介入治疗更多(分别为69%和35%;P < 0.01)。在二期手术前,带环加固移植物组的肺动脉脉压更高(9.1±4.1 vs 4.8±3.1 mmHg,P < 0.001),平均压力无差异(15.2±3.32 vs 14.3±3.48 mmHg,P = 0.27)。带环加固移植物组的校正肺动脉指数(中田指数)更高(213±76 vs 134±68 mm²/m²,P < 0.0001)。
对于接受HLHS一期姑息治疗的婴儿,带环加固导管与减少介入治疗、更高的脉压及更好的肺动脉生长相关。