Suppr超能文献

基于实空间数值网格方法的组态相互作用单激发方法:Kohn-Sham轨道与Hartree-Fock轨道的比较

Configuration interaction singles based on the real-space numerical grid method: Kohn-Sham versus Hartree-Fock orbitals.

作者信息

Kim Jaewook, Hong Kwangwoo, Choi Sunghwan, Hwang Sang-Yeon, Youn Kim Woo

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, KAIST, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea.

出版信息

Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015 Dec 21;17(47):31434-43. doi: 10.1039/c5cp00352k.

Abstract

We developed a program code of configuration interaction singles (CIS) based on a numerical grid method. We used Kohn-Sham (KS) as well as Hartree-Fock (HF) orbitals as a reference configuration and Lagrange-sinc functions as a basis set. Our calculations show that KS-CIS is more cost-effective and more accurate than HF-CIS. The former is due to the fact that the non-local HF exchange potential greatly reduces the sparsity of the Hamiltonian matrix in grid-based methods. The latter is because the energy gaps between KS occupied and virtual orbitals are already closer to vertical excitation energies and thus KS-CIS needs small corrections, whereas HF results in much larger energy gaps and more diffuse virtual orbitals. KS-CIS using the Lagrange-sinc basis set also shows a better or a similar accuracy to smaller orbital space compared to the standard HF-CIS using Gaussian basis sets. In particular, KS orbitals from an exact exchange potential by the Krieger-Li-Iafrate approximation lead to more accurate excitation energies than those from conventional (semi-) local exchange-correlation potentials.

摘要

我们基于数值网格方法开发了组态相互作用单激发(CIS)程序代码。我们使用Kohn-Sham(KS)轨道以及Hartree-Fock(HF)轨道作为参考组态,并使用拉格朗日正弦函数作为基组。我们的计算表明,KS-CIS比HF-CIS更具成本效益且更准确。前者是由于非局部HF交换势极大地降低了基于网格方法中哈密顿矩阵的稀疏性。后者是因为KS占据轨道和虚轨道之间的能隙已经更接近垂直激发能,因此KS-CIS需要的修正较小,而HF会导致更大的能隙和更弥散的虚轨道。与使用高斯基组的标准HF-CIS相比,使用拉格朗日正弦基组的KS-CIS在较小轨道空间中也表现出更好或相似的精度。特别是,通过Krieger-Li-Iafrate近似得到的精确交换势的KS轨道比传统(半)局部交换相关势得到的KS轨道能给出更准确的激发能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验