Indraccolo Allegra, Spence Charles, Vatakis Argiro, Harrar Vanessa
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Department of Human Science, Università Europea di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 2016 May;234(5):1189-98. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4264-2. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
The ability to estimate a filled interval of time is affected by numerous non-temporal factors, such as the sensory modality, duration, and the intensity of the stimulus. Here we explore the role of modality (auditory or visual), stimulus intensity (low vs. high), and motor response speed on the ability to reproduce the duration of short (<1 s) filled intervals. In accordance with the literature, the reproduced duration was affected by both the modality and the intensity of the stimulus; longer reproduction times were generally observed for visual as compared to auditory stimuli, and for low as compared to high-intensity stimuli. We used general estimating equations in order to determine whether these factors independently affected participants' ability to reproduce a given duration, after eliminating the variability associated with reaction time, since it covaried with the reproduced durations. This analysis revealed that stimulus duration, modality, and intensity were all significant independent predictors of the reproduced durations. Additionally, duration interacted with intensity when reproducing auditory intervals. That is, after taking into account the general speeding-up effect that high-intensity stimuli have on responses, they seem to have an additional effect on the rate of the internal clock. These results support previous evidence suggesting that auditory and visual clocks run at different speeds.
估计一段有内容的时间间隔的能力会受到众多非时间因素的影响,例如感觉模态、时长以及刺激的强度。在此,我们探究模态(听觉或视觉)、刺激强度(低强度与高强度)以及运动反应速度对再现短于1秒的有内容时间间隔时长的能力的作用。与文献一致,再现的时长受到刺激的模态和强度的影响;一般而言,与听觉刺激相比,视觉刺激的再现时间更长,与高强度刺激相比,低强度刺激的再现时间更长。我们使用一般估计方程,以确定在消除与反应时间相关的变异性后,这些因素是否独立影响参与者再现给定时长的能力,因为反应时间与再现时长存在共变关系。该分析表明,刺激时长、模态和强度都是再现时长的显著独立预测因素。此外,在再现听觉间隔时,时长与强度存在交互作用。也就是说,在考虑到高强度刺激对反应的一般加速效应后,它们似乎对内部时钟的速率还有额外影响。这些结果支持了先前的证据,表明听觉和视觉时钟运行速度不同。