Elnady Ahmed Mohamed, Zhang Xin, Xiao Zhen Gang, Yong Xinyi, Randhawa Bubblepreet Kaur, Boyd Lara, Menon Carlo
MENRVA Research Group, School of Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University , Burnaby, BC , Canada.
Brain Behaviour Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC , Canada.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 30;9:168. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00168. eCollection 2015.
Traditional, hospital-based stroke rehabilitation can be labor-intensive and expensive. Furthermore, outcomes from rehabilitation are inconsistent across individuals and recovery is hard to predict. Given these uncertainties, numerous technological approaches have been tested in an effort to improve rehabilitation outcomes and reduce the cost of stroke rehabilitation. These techniques include brain-computer interface (BCI), robotic exoskeletons, functional electrical stimulation (FES), and proprioceptive feedback. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have combined all these approaches into a rehabilitation platform that facilitates goal-directed motor movements. Therefore, in this paper, we combined all these technologies to test the feasibility of using a BCI-driven exoskeleton with FES (robotic training device) to facilitate motor task completion among individuals with stroke. The robotic training device operated to assist a pre-defined goal-directed motor task. Because it is hard to predict who can utilize this type of technology, we considered whether the ability to adapt skilled movements with proprioceptive feedback would predict who could learn to control a BCI-driven robotic device. To accomplish this aim, we developed a motor task that requires proprioception for completion to assess motor-proprioception ability. Next, we tested the feasibility of robotic training system in individuals with chronic stroke (n = 9) and found that the training device was well tolerated by all the participants. Ability on the motor-proprioception task did not predict the time to completion of the BCI-driven task. Both participants who could accurately target (n = 6) and those who could not (n = 3), were able to learn to control the BCI device, with each BCI trial lasting on average 2.47 min. Our results showed that the participants' ability to use proprioception to control motor output did not affect their ability to use the BCI-driven exoskeleton with FES. Based on our preliminary results, we show that our robotic training device has potential for use as therapy for a broad range of individuals with stroke.
传统的基于医院的中风康复可能劳动强度大且成本高昂。此外,康复效果因人而异,恢复情况难以预测。鉴于这些不确定性,人们已经测试了多种技术方法,以努力改善康复效果并降低中风康复的成本。这些技术包括脑机接口(BCI)、机器人外骨骼、功能性电刺激(FES)和本体感觉反馈。然而,据我们所知,尚无研究将所有这些方法整合到一个有助于目标导向性运动的康复平台中。因此,在本文中,我们将所有这些技术结合起来,测试使用带有FES的BCI驱动外骨骼(机器人训练设备)来促进中风患者完成运动任务的可行性。该机器人训练设备用于辅助预定义的目标导向性运动任务。由于很难预测谁能使用这类技术,我们考虑了利用本体感觉反馈来适应熟练动作的能力是否能预测谁可以学会控制BCI驱动的机器人设备。为实现这一目标,我们开发了一项需要本体感觉才能完成的运动任务,以评估运动本体感觉能力。接下来,我们测试了机器人训练系统在慢性中风患者(n = 9)中的可行性,发现所有参与者对训练设备的耐受性良好。运动本体感觉任务的能力并不能预测完成BCI驱动任务的时间。能够准确瞄准的参与者(n = 6)和不能准确瞄准的参与者(n = 3)都能够学会控制BCI设备,每次BCI试验平均持续2.47分钟。我们的结果表明,参与者利用本体感觉控制运动输出的能力并不影响他们使用带有FES的BCI驱动外骨骼的能力。基于我们的初步结果,我们表明我们的机器人训练设备有潜力用于治疗广泛的中风患者。