• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的对比:倾向评分匹配病例对照研究。

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case-matched study with propensity score matching.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea.

Gastroenterology Surgical Center, College of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):643-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005
PMID:25872167
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Laparoscopic liver resection has gained wide acceptance and is established as a safe alternative to open liver resection. Until now, there is no prospective randomized comparative study between laparoscopic and open liver resection. Previous comparative studies reported minor resections for peripheral tumors, and enrolled small numbers of patients. Moreover, few reported the long term outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare perioperative and long term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma between two matched groups.

METHODS

389 patients underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma during the period between 2004 and 2013. To overcome selection bias, we performed 1:1 match using propensity score matching between laparoscopic and open liver resection.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 88 patients were included in each group. Laparoscopic group had shorter hospital stay (8 vs. 10 days, p⩽0.001), and lower postoperative morbidity (12.5% vs. 20.4%, p=0.042). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survivals were 91.6%, 87.5%, and 76.4%, for laparoscopic group, and were 93.1%, 87.8%, and 73.2%, for open group (p=0.944). The 1-, 3- and 5-year disease free survivals were 69.7%, 52%, and 44.2%, for laparoscopic group, and 74.7%, 49.5%, 41.2%, for open group (p=0.944).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed comparative perioperative and long term outcomes between both groups, providing evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

摘要

背景与目的

腹腔镜肝切除术已被广泛接受,并已成为开放肝切除术的安全替代方法。到目前为止,还没有腹腔镜肝切除术与开放肝切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。以前的比较研究报告了外周肿瘤的小切除,且纳入的患者数量较少。此外,很少有报道长期结果。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜与开放肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的围手术期和长期结果,并在两组匹配患者中进行。

方法

2004 年至 2013 年间,有 389 例患者因肝细胞癌接受了肝切除术。为了克服选择偏倚,我们使用倾向评分匹配对腹腔镜和开放肝切除术进行了 1:1 匹配。

结果

在进行倾向评分匹配后,每组纳入 88 例患者。腹腔镜组的住院时间更短(8 天比 10 天,p ⩽ 0.001),术后并发症发生率更低(12.5%比 20.4%,p=0.042)。腹腔镜组的 1 年、3 年和 5 年总生存率分别为 91.6%、87.5%和 76.4%,开放组分别为 93.1%、87.8%和 73.2%(p=0.944)。腹腔镜组的 1 年、3 年和 5 年无病生存率分别为 69.7%、52%和 44.2%,开放组分别为 74.7%、49.5%和 41.2%(p=0.944)。

结论

本研究显示两组之间的围手术期和长期结果具有可比性,为腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的安全性和有效性提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Case-matched study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的对比:倾向评分匹配病例对照研究。
J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):643-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
2
Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study.倾向评分匹配下腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期及围手术期结局:一项多机构日本研究
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Oct;22(10):721-7. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.276. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
3
Propensity score analysis of outcomes following laparoscopic or open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.腹腔镜或开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的结果的倾向评分分析。
Br J Surg. 2016 Jun;103(7):871-80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10137. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.一项关于腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的倾向评分匹配病例对照比较研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Dec;24(12):872-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0273.
5
Laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 157 patients: A case controlled study with propensity score matching at two Chinese centres.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗 157 例肝细胞癌的病例对照研究:在中国两家中心采用倾向评分匹配的方法
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Laparoscopic liver re-resection is feasible for patients with posthepatectomy hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: a propensity score matching study.腹腔镜肝再次切除术治疗肝癌术后复发是可行的:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4790-4798. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5556-3. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
7
Long-term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience.长期生存分析:腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的比较:单中心经验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):506-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b947a.
8
Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study Using a Propensity Score Matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的比较:一项倾向评分匹配的对比研究
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):615-625. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4827-z.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Segmentectomy for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹左外叶肝切除术治疗大肝癌:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2019 Dec;29(6):513-519. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000723.
10
Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open liver resection after propensity matching selection.倾向评分匹配选择后腹腔镜与开腹肝切除的临床比较
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):573-87. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.031. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Spectrum of therapeutic options in hepatocellular carcinoma.肝细胞癌的治疗选择范围
J Exerc Rehabil. 2025 Aug 31;21(4):190-199. doi: 10.12965/jer.2550482.241. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Implications of the surgical approach for complex liver resection in the era of enhanced recovery programs: a critical appraisal of the "Orange Segments" randomized controlled trial.快速康复计划时代复杂肝切除术手术入路的影响:对“橙色肝段”随机对照试验的批判性评价
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Aug 1;14(4):634-638. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-2025-265. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
3
Robotic vs laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: multicentric propensity-score matched analysis of surgical and oncologic outcomes in 647 patients.
肝细胞癌的机器人手术与腹腔镜手术切除:647例患者手术及肿瘤学结局的多中心倾向评分匹配分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jul 20. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02293-z.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Caudate Lobe Resection: A Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.腹腔镜与开放尾状叶切除术:一项对比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 21;14(13):4421. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134421.
5
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large (≥ 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.老年患者大尺寸(≥5厘米)肝细胞癌的腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02113-4.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies.机器人辅助与腹腔镜肝切除术:倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae141.
7
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for liver resection: a multicenter cohort study.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的比较:一项多中心队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 2;14(1):26410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76260-w.
8
Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Recent Advances.肝细胞癌的肝切除术:最新进展
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2025 Jan-Feb;15(1):102401. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102401. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (≥ than 10 cm): a retrospective analysis from a high-volume referral center.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗巨大肝细胞癌(≥10cm):来自高容量转诊中心的回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6324-6331. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11091-4. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
10
Comparisons of Percutaneous Ablation, Open or Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0-A Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Concurrent Generalized Propensity Score Analysis.经皮消融、开放或腹腔镜肝切除术治疗巴塞罗那临床肝癌分期0-A期肝细胞癌的比较:一项同步广义倾向评分分析
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Jul 25;11:1459-1472. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S477265. eCollection 2024.