Chen Zhi-Hang, Zhou Qian, Chen Ze-Bin, Xie Wen-Xuan, Song Zi-Min, Lin Shui-Rong, Wang Wei, Shen Shun-Li, Kuang Ming
Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Department of Medical Statistics, Clinical Trials Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2024 Jul 25;11:1459-1472. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S477265. eCollection 2024.
Liver resection and ablation remain the most common therapeutic options for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there is a lack of evidence to show which is the most suitable therapy. This study aimed to make concurrent multi-arm comparisons of the short-term and long-term outcomes of percutaneous ablation (PA), open (OLR) or laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for these patients.
This was a retrospective observational cohort study. A series of generalized propensity score methods for multiple treatment groups were performed to concurrently compare the clinical outcomes of these three treatment options to balance potential confounders. Regression standardization was used to account for hazard of all-cause mortality and recurrence of intergroup differences.
Of the 1778 patients included, 1237, 307 and 234 underwent OLR, LLR and PA, respectively. After overlap weighting, which was the optimal adjustment strategy, patients in the minimally invasive group (LLR and PA groups) had few postoperative complications and short postoperative hospital stays (both P < 0.001). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate were significantly higher in the LLR group when compared with the OLR and PA groups (RFS: 55.6% vs 48.0% vs 30.2%, P < 0.001; OS: 89.1% vs 79.7% vs 84.0%, P = 0.020). Multivariable Cox analysis and regression standardization showed that LLR was an independent factor for better RFS when compared with OLR and PA. In subgroup analysis, the long-term outcomes of patients with BCLC stage A HCC were consistent with the whole population.
In the observational study using various covariate adjustment analysis with excellent balance, LLR is not only minimally invasive, but also provides better RFS and equivalent OS for patients with BCLC stage 0-A HCC when compared with OLR and PA.
肝切除和消融仍然是巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)0-A期肝细胞癌(HCC)最常见的治疗选择,但缺乏证据表明哪种是最合适的治疗方法。本研究旨在对这些患者的经皮消融(PA)、开放肝切除(OLR)或腹腔镜肝切除(LLR)的短期和长期结果进行同步多组比较。
这是一项回顾性观察队列研究。采用一系列针对多个治疗组的广义倾向评分方法,同时比较这三种治疗选择的临床结果,以平衡潜在的混杂因素。使用回归标准化来解释全因死亡率和组间差异复发的风险。
在纳入的1778例患者中,分别有1237例、307例和234例接受了OLR、LLR和PA。在采用最佳调整策略的重叠加权后,微创组(LLR和PA组)患者术后并发症少,术后住院时间短(均P<0.001)。与OLR和PA组相比,LLR组的5年无复发生存率(RFS)和5年总生存率(OS)显著更高(RFS:55.6%对48.0%对30.2%,P<0.001;OS:89.1%对79.7%对84.0%,P=0.020)。多变量Cox分析和回归标准化显示,与OLR和PA相比,LLR是RFS更好的独立因素。在亚组分析中,BCLC A期HCC患者的长期结果与总体人群一致。
在使用具有良好平衡的各种协变量调整分析的观察性研究中,与OLR和PA相比,LLR不仅具有微创性,而且为BCLC 0-A期HCC患者提供了更好的RFS和相当的OS。