Detlefsen Sönke, Mortensen Michael Bau, Pless Torsten Kjærulff, Cribe Anne-Sofie, de Muckadell Ove B Schaffalitzky
From the *Department of Pathology, †HPB Section, Department of Surgery, and ‡Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Pancreas. 2015 Aug;44(6):845-58. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000000312.
The aims of this study were to describe the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) in Denmark and to test the usefulness of the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC) on a geographically well-defined cohort.
All patients diagnosed with AIP at Odense University Hospital from 2007 to 2013 were included (n = 30; mean follow-up, 26.2 months). Data from laparoscopic or percutaneous ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB), resection specimens, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), EUS-guided CNB, computed tomography, serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), and pancreatography were retrospectively analyzed according to ICDC.
Twenty patients were diagnosed with type 1, 8 with type 2, and 2 with not otherwise specified AIP. Twenty-eight patients (93%) could correctly be classified when ICDC were retrospectively applied. Serum IgG4 was elevated in 44% of type 1 and 0% of type 2. Other organ involvement was observed in 40% of type 1 and 13% of type 2, but inflammatory bowel disease only in type 2 (P = 0.001). One patient had IgG4-related chronic perisplenitis as a hitherto undescribed manifestation of IgG4-related disease. Nineteen (91%) of 21 biopsied patients had diagnostic CNB features of AIP. Computed tomography, EUS, and pancreatography showed features highly suggestive or supportive of AIP in 68%, 72%, and 71%, respectively.
Laparoscopic or percutaneous ultrasound-guided CNB had the highest sensitivity for AIP. The ICDC could retrospectively correctly diagnose 93% of the patients.
本研究旨在描述丹麦自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)的诊断情况,并在一个地理定义明确的队列中检验国际共识诊断标准(ICDC)的实用性。
纳入2007年至2013年在欧登塞大学医院被诊断为AIP的所有患者(n = 30;平均随访时间为26.2个月)。根据ICDC对腹腔镜或经皮超声引导下的芯针活检(CNB)、切除标本、内镜超声(EUS)、EUS引导下的CNB、计算机断层扫描、血清免疫球蛋白G4(IgG4)和胰管造影的数据进行回顾性分析。
20例患者被诊断为1型,8例为2型,2例为其他未明确分类的AIP。回顾性应用ICDC时,28例患者(93%)能够被正确分类。1型患者中44%的血清IgG4升高,2型患者中这一比例为0%。1型患者中有40%出现其他器官受累,2型患者中有13%出现其他器官受累,但炎症性肠病仅在2型患者中出现(P = 0.001)。1例患者出现IgG4相关的慢性脾周炎,这是IgG4相关疾病迄今未被描述的一种表现。21例接受活检的患者中有19例(91%)具有AIP的诊断性CNB特征。计算机断层扫描、EUS和胰管造影分别显示出高度提示或支持AIP的特征,比例分别为68%、72%和71%。
腹腔镜或经皮超声引导下的CNB对AIP的敏感性最高。ICDC能够回顾性地正确诊断93%的患者。