Baert-Desurmont Stéphanie, Charbonnier Françoise, Houivet Estelle, Ippolito Lorena, Mauillon Jacques, Bougeard Marion, Abadie Caroline, Malka David, Duffour Jacqueline, Desseigne Françoise, Colas Chrystelle, Pujol Pascal, Lejeune Sophie, Dugast Catherine, Buecher Bruno, Faivre Laurence, Leroux Dominique, Gesta Paul, Coupier Isabelle, Guimbaud Rosine, Berthet Pascaline, Manouvrier Sylvie, Cauchin Estelle, Prieur Fabienne, Laurent-Puig Pierre, Lebrun Marine, Jonveaux Philippe, Chiesa Jean, Caron Olivier, Morin-Meschin Marie-Emmanuelle, Polycarpe-Osaer Florence, Giraud Sophie, Zaanan Aziz, Bonnet Delphine, Mansuy Ludovic, Bonadona Valérie, El Chehadeh Salima, Duhoux François, Gauthier-Villars Marion, Saurin Jean-Christophe, Collonge-Rame Marie-Agnès, Brugières Laurence, Wang Qing, Bressac-de Paillerets Brigitte, Rey Jean-Marc, Toulas Christine, Buisine Marie-Pierre, Bronner Myriam, Sokolowska Joanna, Hardouin Agnès, Cailleux Anne-Françoise, Sebaoui Hakim, Blot Julien, Tinat Julie, Benichou Jacques, Frebourg Thierry
Inserm U1079, University of Rouen, Institute for Research and Innovation in Biomedicine, Rouen, France.
Department of Genetics, University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;24(1):99-105. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.72. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
To determine if the at-risk single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles for colorectal cancer (CRC) could contribute to clinical situations suggestive of an increased genetic risk for CRC, we performed a prospective national case-control study based on highly selected patients (CRC in two first-degree relatives, one before 61 years of age; or CRC diagnosed before 51 years of age; or multiple primary CRCs, the first before 61 years of age; exclusion of Lynch syndrome and polyposes) and controls without personal or familial history of CRC. SNPs were genotyped using SNaPshot, and statistical analyses were performed using Pearson's χ(2) test, Cochran-Armitage test of trend and logistic regression. We included 1029 patients and 350 controls. We confirmed the association of CRC risk with four SNPs, with odds ratio (OR) higher than previously reported: rs16892766 on 8q23.3 (OR: 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.72; P=0.0007); rs4779584 on 15q13.3 (OR: 1.42, CI: 1.11-1.83; P=0.0061) and rs4939827 and rs58920878/Novel 1 on 18q21.1 (OR: 1.49, CI: 1.13-1.98; P=0.007 and OR: 1.49, CI: 1.14-1.95; P=0.0035). We found a significant (P<0.0001) cumulative effect of the at-risk alleles or genotypes with OR at 1.62 (CI: 1.10-2.37), 2.09 (CI: 1.43-3.07), 2.87 (CI: 1.76-4.70) and 3.88 (CI: 1.72-8.76) for 1, 2, 3 and at least 4 at-risk alleles, respectively, and OR at 1.71 (CI: 1.18-2.46), 2.29 (CI: 1.55-3.38) and 6.21 (CI: 2.67-14.42) for 1, 2 and 3 at-risk genotypes, respectively. Combination of SNPs may therefore explain a fraction of clinical situations suggestive of an increased risk for CRC.
为了确定结直肠癌(CRC)的风险单核苷酸多态性(SNP)等位基因是否会导致提示CRC遗传风险增加的临床情况,我们基于精心挑选的患者(两名一级亲属患有CRC,其中一人发病年龄在61岁之前;或CRC在51岁之前确诊;或多发原发性CRC,首例发病年龄在61岁之前;排除林奇综合征和息肉病)和无CRC个人或家族史的对照进行了一项前瞻性全国病例对照研究。使用SNaPshot对SNP进行基因分型,并使用Pearson卡方检验、Cochran-Armitage趋势检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析。我们纳入了1029例患者和350例对照。我们证实了CRC风险与四个SNP的关联,其优势比(OR)高于先前报道:8q23.3上的rs16892766(OR:1.88,95%置信区间(CI):1.30 - 2.72;P = 0.0007);15q13.3上的rs4779584(OR:1.42,CI:1.11 - 1.83;P = 0.0061)以及18q21.1上的rs4939827和rs58920878/Novel 1(OR:1.49,CI:1.13 - 1.98;P = 0.007和OR:1.49,CI:1.14 - 1.95;P = 0.0035)。我们发现风险等位基因或基因型具有显著(P < 0.0001)的累积效应,1、2、3和至少4个风险等位基因的OR分别为1.62(CI:1.10 - 2.37)、2.09(CI:1.43 - 3.07)、2.87(CI:1.76 - 4.70)和3.88(CI:1.72 - 8.76),1、2和3个风险基因型的OR分别为1.71(CI:1.18 - 2.46)、2.29(CI:1.55 - 3.38)和6.21(CI:2.67 - 14.42)。因此,SNP的组合可能解释一部分提示CRC风险增加的临床情况。