Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定对七氟醚麻醉后儿童苏醒期躁动及恢复情况影响的Meta分析:不同给药方式及不同剂量

Meta-analysis of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia: different administration and different dosage.

作者信息

Zhu Min, Wang Haiyun, Zhu Ai, Niu Kaijun, Wang Guolin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Research Institute of Anesthesiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300052, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123728. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on emergence agitation (EA) and recovery profiles in children after sevoflurane anesthesia and its pharmacological mechanisms. Standard bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFP, Springer and ISI Web of Knowledge, were artificially searched to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the impact of dexmedetomidine with placebo, fentanyl and midazolam on EA and recovery profiles after sevoflurane anesthesia in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Two authors assessed the quality of each study independently in accordance with strict inclusion criteria and extracted data. RevMan 5.0 software was applied for performing statistic analysis. The outcomes analyzed included: 1) incidence of EA, 2) emergence time, 3) time to extubation, 4) incidence of post-operation nausea and vomiting, 5) number of patients requiring an analgesic, and 6) time to discharge from PACU. A total of 1364 patients (696 in the dexmedetomidine group and 668 in the placebo, fentanyl and midazolam group) from 20 prospective RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, dexmedetomidine decreased the incidence of EA (risk ratio [RR] 0.37; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.46), incidence of nausea and vomiting (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.85) and number of patients requiring an analgesic (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.59). However, dexmedetomidine had a significantly delayed effect on the emergence time (weighted mean differences [WMD] 1.16; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.60), time to extubation (WMD 0.61; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.95), and time to discharge from recovery room (WMD 2.67; 95% CI 0.95 to 4.39). Compared with fentanyl (RR 1.39; 95% CI 0.78 to 2.48) and midazolam (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.54 to 2.35), dexmedetomidine has no significantly difference on the incidence of EA. However, the analgesia effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperation pain has no significantly statistical differences compared with fentanyl (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.91), which implied that its analgesia effect might play an important role in decreasing the incident of EA. No evidence of publication bias was observed.

摘要

本文旨在评估右美托咪定对七氟醚麻醉后儿童苏醒期躁动(EA)及恢复情况的影响及其药理机制。通过人工检索标准书目数据库,包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFP、Springer和ISI Web of Knowledge,以识别所有比较右美托咪定与安慰剂、芬太尼和咪达唑仑对麻醉后护理单元(PACU)中七氟醚麻醉后EA及恢复情况影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。两位作者根据严格的纳入标准独立评估每项研究的质量并提取数据。应用RevMan 5.0软件进行统计分析。分析的结果包括:1)EA发生率,2)苏醒时间,3)拔管时间,4)术后恶心呕吐发生率,5)需要镇痛的患者数量,6)从PACU出院的时间。来自20项前瞻性RCT的总共1364例患者(右美托咪定组696例,安慰剂、芬太尼和咪达唑仑组668例)纳入荟萃分析。与安慰剂相比,右美托咪定降低了EA发生率(风险比[RR] 0.37;95%置信区间0.30至0.46)、恶心呕吐发生率(RR 0.57;95%置信区间0.38至0.85)以及需要镇痛的患者数量(RR 0.43;95%置信区间0.31至0.59)。然而,右美托咪定对苏醒时间(加权平均差[WMD] 1.16;95%置信区间0.72至1.60)、拔管时间(WMD 0.61;95%置信区间0.27至0.95)以及从恢复室出院时间(WMD 2.67;95%置信区间0.95至4.39)有显著延迟作用。与芬太尼(RR 1.39;95%置信区间0.78至2.48)和咪达唑仑(RR 1.12;95%置信区间0.54至2.35)相比,右美托咪定在EA发生率上无显著差异。然而,右美托咪定对术后疼痛的镇痛效果与芬太尼相比无显著统计学差异(RR 1.12;95%置信区间0.66至1.91),这表明其镇痛效果可能在降低EA发生率中起重要作用。未观察到发表偏倚的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d97/4395116/f80eeb615993/pone.0123728.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验