Zou Chuan, Yang Lihong, Wu Yuchi, Su Guobin, Chen Shuhui, Guo Xinfeng, Wu Xiuqing, Liu Xusheng, Lin Qizhan
Nephrology Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong province, P.R. China.
Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Research Service Group, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine (The Second Affiliated Hospital/Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences), Guangzhou, Guangdong province, P.R. China.
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0122724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122724. eCollection 2015.
To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomized controlled trial compared auricular acupressure (AA) on specific acupoints with AA on non-specific acupoints for treating maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients with insomnia.
Sixty three (63) eligible subjects were randomly assigned into either AA group received AA on specific acupoints (n=32), or sham AA (SAA) group received AA on points irrelevant to insomnia treatment (n=31) for eight weeks. All participants were followed up for 12 weeks after treatments. The primary outcome was clinical response at eight weeks after randomization, defined as a reduction of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) global score by 3 points and more.
Fifty-eight (58) participants completed the trial and five dropped out. Twenty participants in AA group (62.5%) and ten in SAA group (32.3%) responded to the eight-week interventions (χ2 = 5.77, P = 0.02). PSQI global score declined 3.75 ± 4.36 (95%CI -5.32, -2.18) and 2.26 ± 3.89 (95%CI -3.68, -0.83) in AA group and SAA group respectively. Three participants died during the follow-up period. No evidence supported their deaths were related to the AA intervention. No other adverse event was observed.
Feasibility and logistics of patient recruitment, randomization procedure, blinding approach, interventions application and outcome assessment had been tested in this pilot trial. The preliminary data appeared to show a favorable result on AA treatment. A full-scale trial is warranted.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-12002272.
评估一项随机对照试验的可行性和可接受性,该试验比较特定穴位耳穴压豆(AA)与非特定穴位耳穴压豆治疗维持性血液透析(MHD)失眠患者的效果。
63名符合条件的受试者被随机分为两组,一组为特定穴位耳穴压豆组(n = 32),另一组为假耳穴压豆(SAA)组,即在与失眠治疗无关的穴位上进行耳穴压豆(n = 31),为期8周。所有参与者在治疗后随访12周。主要结局是随机分组后8周的临床反应,定义为匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)总分降低3分及以上。
58名参与者完成了试验,5名退出。特定穴位耳穴压豆组20名参与者(62.5%)和假耳穴压豆组10名参与者(32.3%)对8周干预有反应(χ2 = 5.77,P = 0.02)。特定穴位耳穴压豆组和假耳穴压豆组的PSQI总分分别下降了3.75±4.36(95%CI -5.32,-2.18)和2.26±3.89(95%CI -3.68,-0.83)。3名参与者在随访期间死亡。没有证据表明他们的死亡与耳穴压豆干预有关。未观察到其他不良事件。
本试点试验对患者招募、随机化程序、盲法、干预应用和结局评估的可行性和后勤保障进行了测试。初步数据似乎显示耳穴压豆治疗有良好结果。有必要进行大规模试验。
中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR-TRC-12002272。