• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

顺行与逆行交锁髓内钉固定股骨干骨折:骨折愈合时间有无差异?

Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach to Interlocking Nail Fixation of Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures: Is there Difference in Time to Union?

作者信息

Toluse A M, Ikem I C, Akinyoola A L, Esan O, Asuquo J E

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospitals' Complex, Ile- Ife, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015 Mar;22(1):41-4.

PMID:25875411
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antegrade reamed interlocked intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice forfemoral diaphyseal fractures. More recently, retrograde intramedullary nailing of the femur has been seen as a viable alternative to the antegrade nail.

METHODS

This was a prospective comparative study. Consecutive patients were placed alternately into a study group (retrograde nailing) and a control group (antegrade nailing) in a ratio of 2:1 i.e two retrograde nailing for every antegrade nailing. Forty one fractures had interlocking intramedullary fixation via the retrograde approach (study group), while the control group consisted of twenty fractures that had fixation via the antegrade approach. All were followed up for a minimum period of nine months (range of nine to twenty-four months).

RESULTS

The mean duration of surgery in the retrograde group was 157.07minutes and 137.40 minutes in the antegrade group (p=0.093). The mean duration to fracture union was 16.98±4.71 weeks in the retrograde group and 15.80±5.43 weeks in the antegrade group (p = 0.388). There was no incidence of non-union in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Retrograde approach compares favourably with antegrade approach for intramedullary interlocking nail fixation of diaphyseal femoral fracture in adults with respect to time of fracture healing.

摘要

背景

顺行扩髓带锁髓内钉是股骨干骨折的首选治疗方法。最近,股骨逆行髓内钉已被视为顺行髓内钉的一种可行替代方法。

方法

这是一项前瞻性比较研究。连续的患者按2:1的比例交替纳入研究组(逆行髓内钉固定)和对照组(顺行髓内钉固定),即每例顺行髓内钉固定对应两例逆行髓内钉固定。41例骨折采用逆行入路进行带锁髓内固定(研究组),而对照组由20例采用顺行入路进行固定的骨折患者组成。所有患者均随访至少9个月(9至24个月)。

结果

逆行组的平均手术时间为157.07分钟,顺行组为137.40分钟(p = 0.093)。逆行组骨折愈合的平均时间为16.98±4.71周,顺行组为15.80±5.43周(p = 0.388)。两组均无骨不连发生。

结论

在成人股骨干骨折的髓内带锁钉固定方面,就骨折愈合时间而言,逆行入路与顺行入路相比具有优势。

相似文献

1
Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach to Interlocking Nail Fixation of Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures: Is there Difference in Time to Union?顺行与逆行交锁髓内钉固定股骨干骨折:骨折愈合时间有无差异?
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015 Mar;22(1):41-4.
2
Conversion of external fixation to intramedullary nailing for fractures of the shaft of the femur in multiply injured patients.多发伤患者股骨干骨折外固定转为髓内钉固定
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jun;82(6):781-8.
3
Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach.不使用术中透视、骨折复位台和动力扩髓,经皮顺行交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折:逆行入路比顺行入路具有更高的手术效率。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7):1845-1853. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05832-8. Epub 2023 May 4.
4
Comparison of effect of retrograde and antegrade approaches to interlocking nail fixation of femoral diaphyseal fractures on ipsilateral hip and knee joint motion.
West Afr J Med. 2014 Jan-Mar;33(1):21-5.
5
Antegrade Versus Retrograde Locked Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Fractures: Which Is Better?顺行与逆行交锁髓内钉治疗股骨骨折:哪种方法更好?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007 Apr;33(2):135-40. doi: 10.1007/s00068-007-6156-z. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
6
Retrograde versus antegrade intramedullary nailing of gunshot diaphyseal femur fractures.顺行与逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干枪弹骨折。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):3974-80. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3058-8.
7
ANTEGRADE X RETROGRADE NAILING IN FEMORAL FRACTURES: A STUDY ON CONSOLIDATION AND INFECTION.股骨骨折的顺行与逆行髓内钉固定:关于骨愈合与感染的研究
Acta Ortop Bras. 2019 Nov-Dec;27(6):313-316. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220192706218655.
8
Results of femoral intramedullary nailing in patients who are obese versus those who are not obese: a prospective multicenter comparison study.肥胖患者与非肥胖患者股骨髓内钉固定的结果:一项前瞻性多中心比较研究。
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Sep;21(8):523-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31813347ac.
9
Comparison of knee function in patients with a healed fracture of the femoral shaft fixed with retrograde and antegrade intramedullary nailing.逆行与顺行髓内钉固定治疗股骨干骨折愈合患者的膝关节功能比较。
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2013 Oct 31;15(5):395-405. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1084241.
10
[Comparative study of antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing for the treatment of humeral shaft fractures].顺行与逆行髓内钉治疗肱骨干骨折的对比研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Mar;22(3):199-201.

引用本文的文献

1
Antegrade vs Retrograde Intra-Medullary Nailing in Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.股骨干骨折顺行与逆行髓内钉固定术:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(8):535-545. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.78871.3623.
2
Locked intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal femur fractures without intraoperative fluoroscopy, fracture table and power reaming: retrograde affords greater procedural efficiency than antegrade approach.不使用术中透视、骨折复位台和动力扩髓,经皮顺行交锁髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折:逆行入路比顺行入路具有更高的手术效率。
Int Orthop. 2023 Jul;47(7):1845-1853. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05832-8. Epub 2023 May 4.
3
Antegrade versus retrograde nailing techniques and trochanteric versus piriformis intramedullary nailing entry points for femoral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
股骨干骨折的顺行与逆行髓内钉技术及大转子与梨状肌入路髓内钉固定的进针点:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Can J Surg. 2017 Feb;60(1):19-29. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000616.