Bai Xiao-Yan, Li Shujing, Wang Miao, Qu Xinjian, Hu Gaolei, Xu Zhaowei, Chen Min, He Guo-Wei, Wu Huijian
School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Ann Hum Genet. 2015 May;79(3):173-87. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12105. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
We attempted to systematically elucidate the association between monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) -2518A>G polymorphism and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Eligible studies were identified through PubMed, EBSCO, and Web of Science Databases. The magnitude of MCP-1 polymorphism effect and its possible mode of action on CAD were estimated. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled in a specific genetic model to assess the association. A total of 21 studies were involved. There was significant gene effect on CAD risk in the overall population (likelihood ratio test: p < 0.0001). Patients with GG and AG genotypes had 1.435 (95% CI: 1.183-1.740) and 1.087 (95% CI: 1.008-1.172) times higher risk of CAD than those with AA genotype. These gene effects suggested a recessive model to be appropriate. The pooled OR was 1.362 (95% CI: 1.137-1.631; puncorrected = 0.001, pFDR = 0.005) in the recessive model. In the ethnicity-stratified analysis, significant association was observed in the Caucasian population (OR = 1.492; 95% CI: 1.106-2.014; puncorrected = 0.009, pFDR = 0.015), whereas no statistical significant association was detected in the Asian population (adjusted p = 0.124). The results suggested that MCP-1 -2518A>G polymorphism may be associated with susceptibility to CAD, especially in Caucasians.
我们试图系统地阐明单核细胞趋化蛋白-1(MCP-1)-2518A>G多态性与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)风险之间的关联。通过PubMed、EBSCO和科学网数据库识别符合条件的研究。估计了MCP-1多态性效应的大小及其对CAD可能的作用方式。在特定遗传模型中汇总具有95%置信区间(CI)的比值比(OR),以评估这种关联。总共涉及21项研究。在总体人群中,基因对CAD风险有显著影响(似然比检验:p<0.0001)。与AA基因型患者相比,GG和AG基因型患者患CAD的风险分别高1.435倍(95%CI:1.183-1.740)和1.087倍(95%CI:1.008-1.172)。这些基因效应表明隐性模型是合适的。在隐性模型中,汇总的OR为1.362(95%CI:1.137-1.631;p未校正=0.001,pFDR=0.005)。在种族分层分析中,在白种人群中观察到显著关联(OR=1.492;95%CI:1.106-2.014;p未校正=0.009,pFDR=0.015),而在亚洲人群中未检测到统计学显著关联(校正p=0.124)。结果表明,MCP-1 -2518A>G多态性可能与CAD易感性相关,尤其是在白种人中。