Orquera Stefanie, Hertwig Stefan, Alter Thomas, Hammerl Jens A, Jirova Alice, Gölz Greta
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2015 Mar-Apr;128(3-4):141-7.
Recently, there is a growing interest in the use of bacteriophages for pre- and post-harvest applications to reduce foodborne pathogens (including Campylobacter) along the food chain. Quantitative Campylobacter reductions of up to three log10 units have been achieved by phage application. However, possible phage resistance might limit this approach. In Campylobacter (C.) jejuni, phage resistance mechanisms have been described in detail but data on these mechanisms in C. coli are still missing. To study phage resistance in C. coli, strain NCTC 12668 was infected with the lytic phage CP84, belonging to group II of Campylobacter phages. Resistant and sensitive clones were analysed using phenotypic and genotypic assays. C. coli clones acquired only transient resistance against CP84. The resistance led to cross-protection to one out of five other group II phages tested. Phage resistance was apparently neither caused by large genomic rearrangements nor by a CRISPR system. Binding assays demonstrated that CP84 could not adsorb to resistant C. coli clones suggesting a bacterial phage receptor to be involved in resistance. However, phage resistant C. coli clones did not reveal an altered motility or modified flaA sequence. Considering the loss of binding capacity and the reversion to a phage sensitive phenotype we hypothesize that acquired resistance depends on temporal phase variable switch-off modifications of the phage receptor genes, even though the resistance mechanism could not be elucidated in detail. We further speculate that even closely related phages of the same group use different bacterial receptors for binding on C. coli.
最近,人们越来越关注利用噬菌体在收获前和收获后应用中减少食物链中的食源性病原体(包括弯曲杆菌)。通过应用噬菌体,已实现高达三个对数10单位的弯曲杆菌定量减少。然而,可能出现的噬菌体抗性可能会限制这种方法。在空肠弯曲杆菌中,噬菌体抗性机制已得到详细描述,但关于大肠杆菌中这些机制的数据仍然缺失。为了研究大肠杆菌中的噬菌体抗性,用属于弯曲杆菌噬菌体II组的裂解性噬菌体CP84感染菌株NCTC 12668。使用表型和基因型分析对抗性和敏感克隆进行分析。大肠杆菌克隆仅获得了对CP84的短暂抗性。这种抗性导致对所测试的其他五种II组噬菌体中的一种产生交叉保护。噬菌体抗性显然既不是由大的基因组重排引起的,也不是由CRISPR系统引起的。结合试验表明,CP84不能吸附到抗性大肠杆菌克隆上,这表明细菌噬菌体受体参与了抗性。然而,噬菌体抗性大肠杆菌克隆并未显示出运动性改变或flaA序列改变。考虑到结合能力的丧失和恢复到噬菌体敏感表型,我们假设获得性抗性取决于噬菌体受体基因的暂时相位可变关闭修饰,尽管抗性机制尚不能详细阐明。我们进一步推测,即使是同一组的密切相关噬菌体在大肠杆菌上结合时也使用不同的细菌受体。