Khatri B O, Pelletier J, Kappos L, Hartung H-P, Comi G, Barkhof F, von Rosenstiel P, Meng X, Grinspan A, Hashmonay R, Cohen J A
The Regional MS Center, Center for Neurological Disorders, Wheaton Franciscan Health Care, 3237 S. 16th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53215, USA.
CHU La Timone, CRMBM-CNRS 6612, Marseille, France.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2014 May;3(3):355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
Fingolimod demonstrated superior efficacy compared with interferon β-1a intramuscular in relapsing multiple sclerosis. The impact of treatment history on fingolimod efficacy is unknown.
This post-hoc analysis of phase 3 TRANSFORMS data compared the efficacy and safety of fingolimod and interferon β-1a intramuscular among patient subgroups defined by prior treatment history.
Annualized relapse rate and safety of once-daily oral fingolimod 0.5mg, 1.25mg, or once-weekly interferon β-1a 30μg intramuscular for 12 months were analyzed in 1292 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis according to prior disease-modifying therapy, reason for prior disease-modifying therapy discontinuation (adverse events or unsatisfactory therapeutic effect), and prior disease-modifying therapy duration.
Compared with interferon β-1a intramuscular, fingolimod 0.5mg significantly reduced annualized relapse rate in patients who were treatment naive, received prior interferon-β treatment, discontinued prior disease-modifying therapy for unsatisfactory therapeutic effect, or had prior disease-modifying therapy duration of ≥1 year (P≤0.05, all comparisons). Similar trends were observed in patients with prior glatiramer acetate treatment. Significant reductions were also seen with fingolimod 1.25mg for treatment-naive and prior interferon-β-treated patients.
This analysis demonstrates superiority of fingolimod over interferon β-1a intramuscular regardless of prior (interferon-β) treatment and prior treatment efficacy and duration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00340834.
与肌肉注射干扰素β-1a相比,芬戈莫德在复发型多发性硬化症中显示出更高的疗效。治疗史对芬戈莫德疗效的影响尚不清楚。
这项对3期TRANSFORMS数据的事后分析比较了根据既往治疗史定义的患者亚组中芬戈莫德和肌肉注射干扰素β-1a的疗效和安全性。
根据既往疾病修饰治疗、既往疾病修饰治疗停药原因(不良事件或治疗效果不满意)和既往疾病修饰治疗持续时间,对1292例复发型多发性硬化症患者进行分析,这些患者每日口服一次芬戈莫德0.5mg、1.25mg,或每周一次肌肉注射干扰素β-1a 30μg,持续12个月。
与肌肉注射干扰素β-1a相比,芬戈莫德0.5mg在初治患者、接受过干扰素β治疗、因治疗效果不满意而停用既往疾病修饰治疗或既往疾病修饰治疗持续时间≥1年的患者中显著降低年化复发率(所有比较P≤0.05)。在既往接受醋酸格拉替雷治疗的患者中也观察到类似趋势。芬戈莫德1.25mg在初治和既往接受干扰素β治疗的患者中也有显著降低。
该分析表明,无论既往(干扰素β)治疗情况以及既往治疗疗效和持续时间如何,芬戈莫德均优于肌肉注射干扰素β-1a。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00340834。