Suppr超能文献

不同树脂基底和界面处理的II类CAD/CAM陶瓷修复体边缘及内部适合性的体外评价

In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.

作者信息

Sandoval María José, Rocca Giovanni Tommaso, Krejci Ivo, Mandikos Michael, Dietschi Didier

机构信息

Division of Cariology and Endodontology, Dental School, University of Geneva, 19 Rue Barthélémy Menn, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.

Brisbane Prosthodontics, Graceville, Queensland, 4075, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Dec;19(9):2167-77. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1449-9. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This in vitro study evaluated the influence of different composite bases and surface treatments on marginal and internal adaptation of class II CEREC CAD/CAM ceramic inlays, before and after simulated occlusal loading.

METHODS

Thirty-two IPS Empress CAD class II inlays (MO or OD) (n = 8/group) were placed on third molars, with margins 1 mm below the cementum-enamel junction (CEJ), following different cavity treatments. These treatments were non-liner (control group), a flowable composite liner (Premise flow) sandblasted or treated with soft air abrasion and a restorative composite liner (Premise) sandblasted. The restorations were then luted with Premise. All specimens were submitted to 1,000,000 cycles with a 100-N eccentric load. The tooth restoration margins were analysed semi-quantitatively by SEM pre- and post-loading. The internal adaptation was also evaluated after test completion.

RESULTS

The percentage of satisfactory marginal adaptation varied from 75 to 87 % pre-loading and 62 to 72 % post-loading in occlusal enamel, from 71 to 83 % pre-loading and 52 to 63 % post-loading in proximal enamel, and from 68 to 88 % pre-loading and 43 to 66 % post-loading in cervical dentin. There were no significant differences among groups. The percentages of satisfactory tooth-composite internal adaptation varied from 81 to 98 % in occlusal dentin, from 63 to 90 % in axial dentin, and from 71 to 84 % in cervical dentin without any statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study support the use of flowable or restorative composites as a liner underneath ceramic CAD/CAM inlays, producing marginal and internal adaptation which is not different from restorations placed directly on dentin. Soft air abrasion proved not to be different from sandblasting for treating cavities before cementation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The results of this in vitro test validate the increasing use of a flowable base/liner underneath CAD/CAM ceramic inlays to optimise tissue conservation and clinical procedures; in this case, soft air abrasion is recommended as a pre-cementation step.

摘要

目的

本体外研究评估了不同复合基底和表面处理对II类CEREC CAD/CAM陶瓷嵌体在模拟咬合加载前后边缘及内部适应性的影响。

方法

32个IPS Empress CAD II类嵌体(近中-牙合面或远中-牙合面)(n = 8/组)被放置在第三磨牙上,边缘位于牙骨质-釉质界(CEJ)下方1mm处,采用不同的窝洞处理方式。这些处理方式包括不做处理(对照组)、用可流动复合衬层(Premise flow),经喷砂或软质空气磨蚀处理,以及用修复性复合衬层(Premise)经喷砂处理。然后用Premise粘结修复体。所有标本均承受100N偏心载荷的1000000次循环。在加载前后通过扫描电子显微镜对牙齿修复边缘进行半定量分析。在测试完成后还评估了内部适应性。

结果

在咬合面釉质中,加载前边缘适应性良好的百分比为75%至87%,加载后为62%至72%;在邻面釉质中,加载前为71%至83%,加载后为52%至63%;在颈部牙本质中,加载前为68%至88%,加载后为43%至66%。各组之间无显著差异。在咬合面牙本质中,牙齿与复合材料内部适应性良好的百分比为81%至98%,在轴向牙本质中为63%至90%,在颈部牙本质中为71%至84%,无任何统计学差异。

结论

本研究结果支持在陶瓷CAD/CAM嵌体下方使用可流动或修复性复合材料作为衬层,其产生的边缘及内部适应性与直接放置在牙本质上的修复体无异。事实证明,在粘结前处理窝洞时,软质空气磨蚀与喷砂效果无差异。

临床意义

本体外测试结果证实了在CAD/CAM陶瓷嵌体下方越来越多地使用可流动基底/衬层以优化组织保存和临床操作的做法;在这种情况下,建议将软质空气磨蚀作为粘结前的一个步骤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验