Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia.
Cancer. 2015 Jul 15;121(14):2383-92. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29384. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended 6 objectives for achieving patient-centered care. However, most patient-reported outcome measures developed with cancer populations fail to address all 6 patient-centeredness dimensions. The Quality of Patient-Centered Cancer Care (QPCCC) measure was developed on the basis of IOM recommendations, and the measure's validity, reliability, and floor and ceiling effects were examined.
The development of the QPCCC measure included interviews with hematological cancer survivors and feedback from hematologists and cancer patients. To evaluate the measure's psychometric properties, hematological cancer survivors were identified via 2 cancer registries and were mailed the QPCCC measure. To examine test-retest reliability, a second QPCCC measure was mailed to survivors 7 to 14 days after they had returned the first measure.
Overall, 545 hematological cancer survivors completed the 48-item QPCCC measure. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 10-factor structure with factor loadings > 0.40. The subscales were labeled Treatment Delivery, Treatment Decision Making, Coordinated and Integrated Care, Emotional Support, Timely Care, Follow-Up Care, Respectful Communication, Patient Preferences and Values, Cancer Information, and Equitable Care. The QPCCC measure demonstrated acceptable internal consistency for all subscales (Cronbach's α = .73-.94). When test-retest reliability was assessed, 4 items demonstrated substantial agreement (κ > 0.60), whereas 40 items showed moderate agreement (κ = 0.41-0.60). Ceiling effects were present for 8 subscales.
The QPCCC measure has acceptable face and content validity, construct validity, and internal consistency. However, the measure's discriminant validity and test-retest reliability could be improved. The QPCCC measure could be used to improve patient-centered cancer care.
美国医学研究所(IOM)为实现以患者为中心的医疗护理推荐了 6 项目标。然而,大多数针对癌症患者群体开发的患者报告结局测量工具都未能涵盖所有 6 个以患者为中心的维度。基于 IOM 的建议,开发了患者为中心的癌症护理质量(QPCCC)测量工具,并对该工具的有效性、可靠性、以及下限和上限效应进行了检验。
QPCCC 测量工具的开发包括对血液癌症幸存者的访谈,以及血液科医生和癌症患者的反馈。为了评估该测量工具的心理测量学特性,通过 2 个癌症登记处确定了血液癌症幸存者,并向其邮寄了 QPCCC 测量工具。为了检验重测信度,在幸存者首次返回测量工具后 7 至 14 天,再次向其邮寄了第二份 QPCCC 测量工具。
共有 545 名血液癌症幸存者完成了 48 项 QPCCC 测量工具。探索性因素分析显示,该测量工具具有 10 个因子结构,因子负荷 > 0.40。这些子量表分别被标记为治疗提供、治疗决策制定、协调和整合护理、情感支持、及时护理、随访护理、尊重性沟通、患者偏好和价值观、癌症信息以及公平护理。QPCCC 测量工具的所有子量表都具有可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = .73-.94)。当评估重测信度时,有 4 项测量结果具有显著一致性(κ > 0.60),而 40 项测量结果具有中度一致性(κ = 0.41-0.60)。8 个子量表存在天花板效应。
QPCCC 测量工具具有可接受的表面效度、内容效度、结构效度和内部一致性。然而,该测量工具的区分效度和重测信度可以进一步提高。QPCCC 测量工具可用于改善以患者为中心的癌症护理。