Suppr超能文献

盐酸哌甲酯缓释胶囊(Aptensio XR™)治疗儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍的疗效:一项III期随机双盲研究。

Efficacy of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules (Aptensio XR™) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

作者信息

Wigal Sharon B, Nordbrock Earl, Adjei Akwete L, Childress Ann, Kupper Robert J, Greenhill Laurence

机构信息

AVIDA, Inc., 1600 Dove St, Suite 305, Newport Beach, CA, USA,

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2015 Apr;29(4):331-40. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0241-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychostimulants remain first-line treatment options for the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A multilayer extended-release bead methylphenidate capsule (provisional name Aptensio XR™, MPH-MLR) with unique release properties is being investigated for the treatment of ADHD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy (primary) and safety and tolerability (secondary) of MPH-MLR compared with placebo in children and adolescents aged 6-18 years with ADHD.

METHODS

This study was a parallel, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, forced-dose, phase III study in which patients were randomized to placebo or MPH-MLR 10, 15, 20, or 40 mg given once daily. There were four study phases: (1) 4-week screening/baseline; (2) 1-week, double-blind treatment (DBP); (3) 11-week, open-label, dose-optimization period; and (4) 30-day follow-up call. During the open-label dose-optimization period all patients started with MPH-MLR 10 mg, unless the investigator deemed it necessary to begin at a higher dose, and were titrated to an optimized dose (10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg; all given once daily) based on response and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to end of DBP in ADHD Rating Scale, 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score. Secondary endpoints included changes in ADHD-RS-IV subscales and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) at the end of the DBP. The primary analysis was an analysis of covariance including terms for treatment, site, and baseline ADHD-RS-IV total score.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients completed the DBP. The primary endpoint had a statistically significant difference among treatments (p = 0.0046) and sites (p = 0.0018), and baseline covariate made a significant contribution (p < 0.0001). As the MPH-MLR dose increased, the ADHD-RS-IV total score improved; the 20 and 40 mg doses were statistically different (p = 0.0145 and p = 0.0011, respectively) from placebo. Females responded differently than did males (p = 0.0238); there was a significant difference among treatments for males but not for females, partly because only one-third of subjects were female and partly because some females who received placebo had considerable improvement during the DBP. Similarly, the ADHD-RS-IV subscales and CGI-I scores at the end of the DBP also showed more improvement as the dose of MPH-MLR increased. During the open-label phase, ADHD-RS-IV total scores improved (mean change from baseline -22.5) and correlated as the dose of MPH-MLR increased; CGI-I scores also improved. No unexpected AEs were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose-related improvements in ADHD-RS-IV scores that exceeded those of placebo were observed in patients treated with MPH-MLR. No new safety signals were noted.

摘要

背景

精神兴奋剂仍然是治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的一线治疗选择。一种具有独特释放特性的多层缓释珠甲基苯丙胺胶囊(暂定名Aptensio XR™,MPH-MLR)正在被研究用于治疗ADHD。

目的

本研究的目的是评估MPH-MLR与安慰剂相比,在6至18岁患有ADHD的儿童和青少年中的疗效(主要)以及安全性和耐受性(次要)。

方法

本研究是一项平行、双盲、多中心、安慰剂对照、强制剂量的III期研究,患者被随机分配到安慰剂组或每日一次给予10、15、20或40毫克MPH-MLR组。共有四个研究阶段:(1)4周筛查/基线期;(2)1周双盲治疗期(DBP);(3)11周开放标签剂量优化期;(4)30天随访电话。在开放标签剂量优化期,所有患者均从10毫克MPH-MLR开始,除非研究者认为有必要从更高剂量开始,并根据反应和不良事件(AE)滴定至优化剂量(10、15、20、30、40、50、60毫克;均每日一次)。主要终点是ADHD评定量表第四版(ADHD-RS-IV)总分从基线到DBP结束时的变化。次要终点包括DBP结束时ADHD-RS-IV子量表和临床总体印象改善量表(CGI-I)的变化。主要分析是协方差分析,包括治疗、研究中心和基线ADHD-RS-IV总分的项。

结果

共有221名患者完成了DBP。主要终点在治疗组间(p = 0.0046)和研究中心间(p = 0.0018)有统计学显著差异,基线协变量有显著贡献(p < 0.0001)。随着MPH-MLR剂量增加,ADHD-RS-IV总分改善;20毫克和40毫克剂量与安慰剂相比有统计学差异(分别为p = 0.0145和p = 0.0011)。女性的反应与男性不同(p = 0.0238);男性治疗组间有显著差异,女性则无,部分原因是只有三分之一的受试者为女性,部分原因是一些接受安慰剂的女性在DBP期间有相当大的改善。同样,DBP结束时ADHD-RS-IV子量表和CGI-I评分也随着MPH-MLR剂量增加而有更多改善。在开放标签阶段,ADHD-RS-IV总分改善(从基线平均变化-​22.5),且与MPH-MLR剂量增加相关;CGI-I评分也改善。未观察到意外的AE。

结论

在用MPH-MLR治疗的患者中观察到ADHD-RS-IV评分与剂量相关的改善超过了安慰剂组。未发现新的安全信号。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157e/4425805/ef692b431b06/40263_2015_241_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验