Suppr超能文献

安非他命对血压的影响。

Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.

作者信息

Chan Magnus, Chan Jocelyn Joy, Wright James M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):CD007896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007896.pub4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Daily ingestion of amphetamines is common, as they are widely prescribed for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other diagnoses. People also use amphetamines recreationally or in an attempt to boost cognitive or athletic performance. Amphetamines have the potential to increase blood pressure, and we do not know if the long-term benefits of daily amphetamine use outweigh the potential harms.

OBJECTIVES

Primary: to quantify the changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in children and adults taking amphetamines, compared to placebo. Secondary: to quantify the changes in heart rate in children and adults taking amphetamines, compared to placebo; to quantify the number of withdrawals due to adverse effects of amphetamine, compared to placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the Cochrane Hypertension Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and two clinical trial registers, together with reference checking and contact with study authors to identify the studies included in the review. We imposed no restrictions on language, publication year or publication status. The latest search date was March 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of daily oral amphetamines versus placebo on blood pressure. There were no restrictions on participants' age or gender.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. Primary outcomes were change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) above atmospheric pressure; continuous outcomes). Secondary outcomes were heart rate (measured as beats per minute; continuous outcome) and withdrawals due to adverse effects (dichotomous outcome). We calculated continuous outcomes as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We expressed withdrawals due to adverse effects as a risk ratio with 95% CI. We used a fixed-effect model to pool effect sizes from all studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 56 RCTs with a total of 10,583 participants, both adults and children. Most studies were conducted in North America (mainly the USA), followed by Europe. A few studies took place in Asia (Japan) and Australia. The studies tested racemic amphetamine, dextroamphetamine, mixed amphetamine salts, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, methyl​enedioxy​methamphetamine (MDMA) and methylphenidate. The amphetamines were prescribed for ADHD, weight loss and other indications. In 48 RCTs, blood pressure was measured within 24 hours of the last dose. Based on data from all included studies, amphetamines increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 1.93 mmHg (95% CI 1.54 to 2.31) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by 1.84 mmHg (95% CI 1.51 to 2.16) (56 studies, 10,583 participants; high-certainty evidence for both). Amphetamines increased heart rate by 3.71 beats per minute (95% CI 3.27 to 4.14; 47 studies, 10,075 participants; high-certainty evidence). In a subgroup analysis limited to studies that gave participants amphetamines for at least eight weeks, the effects were similar, suggesting that these are sustained effects. These findings suggest that people taking daily oral amphetamines are at increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Participants in the amphetamine group were also more likely to withdraw from the study due to adverse effects compared to those given placebo (risk ratio 2.69, 95% CI 2.13 to 3.40; absolute risk increase of 4.3% over an average duration of 1 month; 42 studies, 8952 participants; high-certainty evidence). In general, the studies were well-executed, and the methodology was sound. We judged most studies to have a low risk of bias across most domains. Selection bias (random sequence generation and allocation concealment) was the domain most often rated as at unclear risk of bias, because the methods used were not reported. We judged 13 studies (23%) to have a high risk of bias in at least one of the seven domains, primarily due to high dropout rates, leading to a high risk of attrition bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Daily oral amphetamines increase blood pressure, heart rate, and withdrawals due to adverse effects, with these effects observed across all time points, including shorter (≤ four weeks) and longer durations (> four weeks to < eight weeks; ≥ eight weeks) of use. Future trials should measure blood pressure using 24-hour ambulatory monitoring and assess the effect of long-term use.

摘要

背景

每日服用苯丙胺很常见,因为它们被广泛用于治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)及其他病症。人们也会出于娱乐目的或试图提高认知能力或运动表现而使用苯丙胺。苯丙胺有可能升高血压,而且我们并不清楚每日使用苯丙胺的长期益处是否超过潜在危害。

目的

主要目的:与安慰剂相比,量化服用苯丙胺的儿童和成人收缩压和舒张压的变化。次要目的:与安慰剂相比,量化服用苯丙胺的儿童和成人心率的变化;与安慰剂相比,量化因苯丙胺不良反应而退出研究的人数。

检索方法

我们使用了Cochrane高血压专业注册库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase以及两个临床试验注册库,并通过参考文献核对和与研究作者联系来识别纳入综述的研究。我们对语言、发表年份或发表状态没有限制。最新检索日期为2023年3月。

入选标准

比较每日口服苯丙胺与安慰剂对血压影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。对参与者的年龄或性别没有限制。

数据收集与分析

我们采用了Cochrane预期的标准方法。主要结局是收缩压和舒张压的变化(以高于大气压的毫米汞柱(mmHg)为单位测量;连续性结局)。次要结局是心率(以每分钟心跳次数为单位测量;连续性结局)和因不良反应而退出研究的情况(二分法结局)。我们将连续性结局计算为平均差值(MD)及95%置信区间(CI)。我们将因不良反应而退出研究的情况表示为风险比及95%CI。我们使用固定效应模型汇总所有研究的效应量。

主要结果

我们纳入了56项RCT,共有10583名参与者,包括成人和儿童。大多数研究在北美(主要是美国)进行,其次是欧洲。少数研究在亚洲(日本)和澳大利亚开展。这些研究测试了消旋苯丙胺、右旋苯丙胺、混合苯丙胺盐、赖氨酸右旋苯丙胺二甲磺酸盐、亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺(摇头丸)和哌甲酯。苯丙胺被用于治疗ADHD以及减肥和其他适应症。在48项RCT中,在最后一剂药物后的24小时内测量了血压。基于所有纳入研究的数据,苯丙胺使收缩压(SBP)升高1.93 mmHg(95%CI 1.54至2.31),舒张压(DBP)升高1.84 mmHg(95%CI 1.51至2.16)(56项研究,10583名参与者;两者均为高确定性证据)。苯丙胺使心率每分钟增加3.71次(95%CI 3.27至4.14;47项研究,10075名参与者;高确定性证据)。在一项仅限于给参与者服用苯丙胺至少8周的亚组分析中,效果相似,表明这些是持续性效应。这些发现表明,每日口服苯丙胺的人发生不良心血管事件的风险增加。与服用安慰剂的人相比,苯丙胺组的参与者也更有可能因不良反应而退出研究(风险比2.69,95%CI 2.13至3.40;在平均1个月的时间内绝对风险增加4.3%;42项研究,8952名参与者;高确定性证据)。总体而言,这些研究执行良好,方法合理。我们判断大多数研究在大多数领域的偏倚风险较低。选择偏倚(随机序列生成和分配隐藏)是最常被评为偏倚风险不明确的领域,因为所使用的方法未报告。我们判断13项研究(23%)在七个领域中的至少一个领域存在高偏倚风险,主要是由于高失访率,导致高损耗偏倚风险。

作者结论

每日口服苯丙胺会升高血压、心率,并增加因不良反应而退出研究的人数,在所有时间点都观察到了这些影响,包括较短(≤4周)和较长(>4周至<8周;≥8周)的使用时长。未来的试验应使用24小时动态血压监测来测量血压,并评估长期使用的效果。

相似文献

1
Effect of amphetamines on blood pressure.安非他命对血压的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):CD007896. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007896.pub4.
3
Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂对血压的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 27;3(3):CD007895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007895.pub3.
5

本文引用的文献

1
Multiarm studies and how to handle them in a meta-analysis: A tutorial.多臂研究以及如何在荟萃分析中处理它们:教程
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Dec 20;1(10):e12033. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12033. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Effect of adrenergic agonist oral decongestants on blood pressure.肾上腺素能激动剂口服减充血剂对血压的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 27;3(3):CD007895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007895.pub3.
10
Effect of Methylphenidate on Apathy in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: The ADMET 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.**标题**:哌醋甲酯治疗阿尔茨海默病患者淡漠症状的效果:ADMET-2 随机临床试验 **摘要**: **背景**:淡漠是阿尔茨海默病患者常见的非认知症状之一,可能会导致认知和功能下降,以及生活质量降低。 **目的**:评估哌醋甲酯对阿尔茨海默病患者淡漠症状的疗效。 **设计、地点和参与者**:ADMET-2 是一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验,在加拿大和美国的 14 个记忆和老龄化诊所进行。招募了年龄在 55 岁及以上、有轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病、基线时淡漠症状严重且稳定的患者。患者被随机分配(1∶1)接受哌醋甲酯或安慰剂治疗,每天 2 次,持续 12 周。主要结局是从基线到第 12 周时,经过验证的淡漠症状量表(斯坦福嗜睡量表)的变化。 **干预**:哌醋甲酯(10 至 40 mg)或安慰剂。 **结果**:共 147 名患者被随机分配接受哌醋甲酯(n=73)或安慰剂(n=74)治疗。两组患者的基线特征相似。在第 12 周时,哌醋甲酯组患者的淡漠症状显著改善(平均差异,-4.66 点;95% CI,-7.73 点至-1.59 点;P=0.002),而安慰剂组患者的淡漠症状无显著变化(平均差异,-0.77 点;95% CI,-3.34 点至1.79 点;P=0.55)。哌醋甲酯组和安慰剂组患者的不良事件发生率相似(28.8%比 24.3%;P=0.72)。 **结论和意义**:在这项为期 12 周的临床试验中,与安慰剂相比,哌醋甲酯治疗可显著改善阿尔茨海默病患者的淡漠症状,且安全性和耐受性良好。这些结果支持在阿尔茨海默病患者中进一步研究哌醋甲酯治疗淡漠症状的作用。 **临床试验注册**:ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT01275076。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Nov 1;78(11):1324-1332. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.3356.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验