Doval Dinesh Chandra, Shirali Rashmi, Sinha Rupal
Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;6(2):82-5. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.154003.
Clinical trials are the mainstay for bringing out newer and better drugs to serve the mankind. By virtue of participating in a clinical trial, a patient receives access to the newer drugs/therapies, but nothing is generally being offered to them once their participation in the study comes to an end. Though the issue of post-trial access to treatment by patients participating in a clinical trial is debatable, there is no compelling justification either for or against it. We examined a case study in order to evaluate the applicability of post-trial access to treatment for patients participating in clinical trials. The provision of post-trial access to treatment should also keep into consideration the compassionate use of drugs on humanitarian grounds, especially in cases of trial drugs that have offered significant benefit to the trial patients and whose termination would lead to deterioration in patient's overall condition. In the present era of personalized medicine, the incorporation of genetic testing into clinical practice further authenticates the rationale of compassionate use of drugs and post-trial access to treatment.
临床试验是研发更新、更好药物以服务人类的主要手段。通过参与临床试验,患者能够接触到更新的药物/疗法,但一旦他们参与的研究结束,通常不会再为他们提供任何东西。尽管参与临床试验的患者在试验后获得治疗的问题存在争议,但支持或反对这一做法都没有令人信服的理由。我们研究了一个案例,以评估参与临床试验的患者在试验后获得治疗的适用性。在试验后提供治疗还应考虑基于人道主义理由的药物同情使用,特别是在试验药物已给试验患者带来显著益处且停用会导致患者整体状况恶化的情况下。在当今个性化医疗时代,将基因检测纳入临床实践进一步证实了药物同情使用和试验后获得治疗的合理性。