Di Fabio Diana R, Blomme Courtney K, Smith Katie M, Welk Gregory J, Campbell Christina G
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, 220 MacKay Hall, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Nutritional Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Feb 24;12:27. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0191-7.
Physical activity (PA) interventions designed to prevent prenatal complications have focused on increasing moderate PA yielding conflicting results. Minimal attention has focused on the evaluation of sleep, sedentary behavior (SB), light activity or total daily PA during pregnancy. The purpose of this prospective, longitudinal study was to 1) objectively quantify and compare habitual PA and SB during the 2nd and 3rd trimester; and 2) evaluate differences in activity patterns for women meeting prenatal PA guidelines versus those that did not.
Forty-six participants wore 2 PA monitors (SenseWear Mini and activPAL) during week 18 and week 35 of pregnancy. We compared differences in sleep duration, postural allocation, daily steps, and PA between the 2nd and 3rd trimester and for women who met and did not meet PA guidelines.
During the 2(nd) trimester, 30% of the women's day (24-hours) was total sleep; 52% SB; 13% light; 3% moderate; and 0% vigorous PA. Light (P = 0.05), vigorous (P = 0.02), and moderate-vigorous PA (MET-minutes; P = 0.02), decreased with a trend in increased SB (P = 0.07). Activity of other intensities and sleep duration did not significantly change. Only 39% and 37% of participants slept between 7-9 hours/night at week 18 and 35, respectively. Forty-six percent (n = 21) and 28% (n = 13) of participants met prenatal PA guidelines during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester, respectively. At week 18, no differences in total sleep, SB, or light PA existed for women who met PA guidelines versus those who did not; total PA was significantly greater for women who met guidelines. At week 35, women that met PA guidelines had significantly less SB (P < 0.005) than women who did not.
This study demonstrates that pregnant women spend the majority of their day in SB. Significant reductions in total activity across pregnancy may be attributed, in part to shifts in light PA and increased SB. Based on the lifestyle of our sample, regardless of meeting PA guidelines in mid-pregnancy, no significant difference exists in time spent in SB, however meeting PA recommendations in late pregnancy may reduce SB. Future interventions should target reducing SB by increasing light and moderate PA beyond volitional exercise.
旨在预防产前并发症的体育活动(PA)干预措施主要集中在增加中等强度的PA上,但结果相互矛盾。很少有人关注孕期睡眠、久坐行为(SB)、轻度活动或每日总PA的评估。这项前瞻性纵向研究的目的是:1)客观量化并比较孕中期和孕晚期的习惯性PA和SB;2)评估达到产前PA指南的女性与未达到该指南的女性在活动模式上的差异。
46名参与者在孕期第18周和第35周佩戴了2个PA监测器(SenseWear Mini和activPAL)。我们比较了孕中期和孕晚期以及达到和未达到PA指南的女性在睡眠时间、姿势分配、每日步数和PA方面的差异。
在孕中期,女性一天(24小时)中有30%的时间用于睡眠;52%的时间为SB;13%为轻度活动;3%为中等强度活动;0%为剧烈活动。轻度活动(P = 0.05)、剧烈活动(P = 0.02)和中等至剧烈强度的PA(代谢当量分钟;P = 0.02)减少,SB有增加的趋势(P = 0.07)。其他强度的活动和睡眠时间没有显著变化。在第18周和第35周,分别只有39%和37%的参与者每晚睡眠7 - 9小时。在孕中期和孕晚期,分别有46%(n = 21)和28%(n = 13)的参与者达到产前PA指南。在第18周,达到PA指南的女性与未达到该指南的女性在总睡眠时间、SB或轻度PA方面没有差异;达到指南的女性总PA显著更高。在第35周,达到PA指南的女性的SB显著少于未达到该指南的女性(P < 0.005)。
这项研究表明,孕妇一天中的大部分时间处于SB状态。孕期总活动量的显著减少可能部分归因于轻度PA的变化和SB的增加。基于我们样本的生活方式,无论在孕中期是否达到PA指南,SB时间没有显著差异,然而在孕晚期达到PA建议可能会减少SB。未来的干预措施应旨在通过增加除自愿锻炼之外的轻度和中等强度PA来减少SB。