Kalantar Motamedi Mahmood Reza, Heidarpour Majid, Siadat Sara, Kalantar Motamedi Alimohammad, Bahreman Ali Akbar
Scientific Researcher, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Assistant Professor, Dental Materials Research Center, and Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;73(9):1672-85. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.03.031. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
Extraction of mandibular third molars (M3s) in close proximity to the mandibular canal has some inherent risks to adjacent structures, such as neurologic damage to teeth, bone defects distal to the mandibular second molar (M2), or pathologic fractures in association with enlarged dentigerous cysts. The procedure for extrusion and subsequent extraction of high-risk M3s is called orthodontic extraction. This is a systematic review of the available approaches for orthodontic extraction of impacted mandibular M3s in close proximity to the mandibular canal and their outcomes.
The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), DOAJ, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, Iranian Science Information Database (SID), Iranmedex, and Irandoc databases were searched using specific keywords up to June 2, 2014. Studies were evaluated based on predetermined eligibility criteria, treatment approaches, and their outcomes.
Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 123 impacted teeth were extracted by orthodontic extraction and 2 cases were complicated by transient paresthesia. Three types of biomechanical approaches were used: 1) using the posterior maxillary region as the anchor for orthodontic extrusion of lower M3s, 2) simple cantilever springs attached to the M3 buttonhole, and 3) cantilever springs tied to a bonded orthodontic bracket on the M3 plus multiple-loop spring wire for distal movement of the M3. Osteo-periodontal status of M2s also improved uneventfully.
Despite the drawbacks of orthodontic extraction, removal of deeply impacted M3s using the described techniques is safe with regard to mandibular nerve injury and neurologic damage. Orthodontic extraction is recommended for extraction of impacted M3s that present a high risk of postoperative osteo-periodontal defects on the distal surface of the adjacent M2 and those associated with dentigerous cysts.
在下颌管附近拔除下颌第三磨牙(M3)对邻近结构存在一些固有风险,例如牙齿神经损伤、下颌第二磨牙(M2)远中骨缺损,或与含牙囊肿增大相关的病理性骨折。高风险M3的挤压及后续拔除程序称为正畸拔牙。本文是对下颌管附近阻生下颌M3正畸拔牙的可用方法及其结果的系统评价。
截至2014年6月2日,使用特定关键词检索了PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、DOAJ、谷歌学术、OpenGrey、伊朗科学信息数据库(SID)、Iranmedex和Irandoc数据库。根据预先确定的纳入标准、治疗方法及其结果对研究进行评估。
13篇文章符合纳入标准。通过正畸拔牙共拔除123颗阻生牙,2例出现短暂性感觉异常并发症。使用了三种生物力学方法:1)以上颌后牙区为支抗对下颌M3进行正畸挤压;2)简单悬臂弹簧连接到M3的扣眼;3)悬臂弹簧连接到M3上粘结的正畸托槽并加上多圈弹簧丝以使M3远中移动。M2的牙周骨状况也顺利改善。
尽管正畸拔牙存在缺点,但使用所述技术拔除深部阻生的M3在下颌神经损伤和神经损害方面是安全的。对于在相邻M2远中面存在术后牙周骨缺损高风险以及与含牙囊肿相关的阻生M3,建议采用正畸拔牙。