Eckfeldt John H, Karger Amy B, Miller W Greg, Rynders Gregory P, Inker Lesley A
From the Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Drs Eckfeldt and Karger).
and the Advanced Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (Mr Rynders).
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Jul;139(7):888-93. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0427-CP. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
Cystatin C is becoming an increasingly popular biomarker for estimating glomerular filtration rate, and accurate measurements of cystatin C concentrations are necessary for accurate estimates of glomerular filtration rate.
To assess the accuracy of cystatin C concentration measurements in laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists CYS Survey.
Two fresh frozen serum pools, the first from apparently healthy donors and the second from patients with chronic kidney disease, were prepared and distributed to laboratories participating in the CYS Survey along with the 2 usual processed human plasma samples. Target values were established for each pool by using 2 immunoassays and ERM DA471/IFCC international reference material.
For the normal fresh frozen pool (ERM-DA471/IFCC-traceable target of 0.960 mg/L), the all-method mean (SD, % coefficient of variation [CV]) reported by all of the 123 reporting laboratories was 0.894 mg/L (0.128 mg/L, 14.3%). For the chronic kidney disease pool (ERM-DA471/IFCC-traceable target of 2.37 mg/L), the all-method mean (SD, %CV) was 2.258 mg/L (0.288 mg/L, 12.8%). There were substantial method-specific biases (mean milligram per liter reported for the normal pool was 0.780 for Siemens, 0.870 for Gentian, 0.967 for Roche, 1.061 for Diazyme, and 0.970 for other/not specified reagents; and mean milligram per liter reported for the chronic kidney disease pool was 2.052 for Siemens, 2.312 for Gentian, 2.247 for Roche, 2.909 for Diazyme, and 2.413 for other/not specified reagents).
Manufacturers need to improve the accuracy of cystatin C measurement procedures if cystatin C is to achieve its full potential as a biomarker for estimating glomerular filtration rate.
胱抑素C正成为一种越来越受欢迎的用于估算肾小球滤过率的生物标志物,准确测量胱抑素C浓度对于准确估算肾小球滤过率至关重要。
评估参加美国病理学家学会胱抑素C调查的实验室中胱抑素C浓度测量的准确性。
制备了两个新鲜冷冻血清池,第一个来自表面健康的供体,第二个来自慢性肾病患者,并将其与2份常规处理的人血浆样本一起分发给参加胱抑素C调查的实验室。通过使用两种免疫测定法和ERM DA471/IFCC国际参考物质为每个血清池确定目标值。
对于正常新鲜冷冻血清池(ERM-DA471/IFCC可溯源目标值为0.960mg/L),123个报告实验室报告的所有方法的平均值(标准差,变异系数[CV]%)为0.894mg/L(0.128mg/L,14.3%)。对于慢性肾病血清池(ERM-DA471/IFCC可溯源目标值为2.37mg/L),所有方法的平均值(标准差,CV%)为2.258mg/L(0.288mg/L,12.8%)。存在显著的方法特异性偏差(正常血清池每升报告的毫克数平均值,西门子为0.780,健赞为0.870,罗氏为0.967,迪亚酶为1.061,其他/未指定试剂为0.970;慢性肾病血清池每升报告的毫克数平均值,西门子为2.052,健赞为2.312,罗氏为2.247,迪亚酶为2.909,其他/未指定试剂为2.413)。
如果胱抑素C要充分发挥其作为估算肾小球滤过率生物标志物的潜力,制造商需要提高胱抑素C测量程序的准确性。