Suppr超能文献

参与美国病理学家学院 2019 年 CYS 调查的实验室检测血清胱抑素 C 的性能得到提高。

Improved Performance in Measurement of Serum Cystatin C by Laboratories Participating in the College of American Pathologists 2019 CYS Survey.

机构信息

From the Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Karger, Eckfeldt).

From the Department of Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Long).

出版信息

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Oct 1;146(10):1218-1223. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0306-CP.

Abstract

CONTEXT.—: Use of cystatin C for glomerular filtration rate estimation (eGFR) has garnered heightened interest as a means to avoid race-based medicine, since eGFRcys equations do not require specification of race. Before considering more widespread use of cystatin C, it is important to confirm that assays provide accurate measurements of cystatin C concentration, to ensure accurate GFR estimates.

OBJECTIVE.—: To determine if the accuracy of cystatin C measurements in laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Cystatin C (CYS) survey has improved since 2014.

DESIGN.—: Two fresh frozen serum pools, the first from healthy donors without chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the second from patients with CKD, along with a synthetically prepared elevated cystatin C pool, were sent to laboratories participating in the 2019 CYS-A survey. Target values were established by using 2 immunoassays and a bracketed 2-point calibration with diluted ERM-DA471/IFCC reference material.

RESULTS.—: For the healthy donor fresh frozen pool (ERM-DA471/IFCC-traceable target of 0.725 mg/L), the all-method mean (standard deviation, coefficient of variation) was 0.731 mg/L (0.071, 9.7%). For the CKD pool (ERM-DA471/IFCC-traceable target of 2.136 mg/L), the all-method mean was 2.155 mg/L (0.182, 8.4%). For the synthetically spiked pool (ERM-DA471/IFCC-traceable target of 1.843 mg/L), the all-method mean was 1.886 mg/L (0.152, 8.1%). This represents marked improvement in accuracy and between-method agreement compared to the 2014 CAP survey.

CONCLUSIONS.—: Manufacturers have markedly improved accuracy and between-method agreement of cystatin C measurement procedures since 2014, which allows for greater confidence in estimated GFR relying on cystatin C.

摘要

背景

胱抑素 C 用于肾小球滤过率估计(eGFR)的应用引起了人们的极大兴趣,因为它可以避免基于种族的医学,因为 eGFRcys 方程不需要指定种族。在考虑更广泛地使用胱抑素 C 之前,重要的是要确认检测方法能够准确测量胱抑素 C 的浓度,以确保 GFR 估计的准确性。

目的

确定参加美国病理学家学院(CAP)胱抑素 C(CYS)调查的实验室中胱抑素 C 测量的准确性是否自 2014 年以来有所提高。

设计

将两个新鲜冷冻的血清池,第一个来自没有慢性肾脏病(CKD)的健康供体,第二个来自 CKD 患者,以及一个合成制备的升高的胱抑素 C 池,送到参加 2019 年 CYS-A 调查的实验室。通过使用 2 种免疫测定法和用稀释的 ERM-DA471/IFCC 参考物质进行 2 点定标来建立靶值。

结果

对于健康供体新鲜冷冻池(ERM-DA471/IFCC 可追踪靶值为 0.725mg/L),所有方法的平均值(标准偏差,变异系数)为 0.731mg/L(0.071,9.7%)。对于 CKD 池(ERM-DA471/IFCC 可追踪靶值为 2.136mg/L),所有方法的平均值为 2.155mg/L(0.182,8.4%)。对于合成添加的池(ERM-DA471/IFCC 可追踪靶值为 1.843mg/L),所有方法的平均值为 1.886mg/L(0.152,8.1%)。与 2014 年 CAP 调查相比,这代表了准确性和方法间一致性的显著提高。

结论

自 2014 年以来,制造商已经显著提高了胱抑素 C 测量程序的准确性和方法间一致性,这使得基于胱抑素 C 的 GFR 估计更加可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验