Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, and Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul;12(7):1490-500. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) can occur during propafenone therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with structurally normal heart.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of propafenone-associated VAs in AF patients with structurally normal heart.
We studied and compared the risk of new-onset VAs between AF patients with structurally normal heart taking and those not taking propafenone in a nationwide longitudinal cohort in Taiwan (n = 127,197 since 2000). We then investigated the association between propafenone and VA in AF patients with structurally normal heart in a single-center database (n = 396).
In the nationwide cohort, 102 patients (0.008% per patient-year) developed ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) during a follow-up period of 9.8 ± 3.5 years. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, propafenone treatment was a significant risk factor for new-onset VT/VF with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-9.89, P = .0136). Propafenone treatment offered protection against ischemic stroke with HR 0.649 (95% CI 0.55-0.77, P<.001). In the single-center study using ECG and medical records, the presence of inferior J wave, wider QRS, and old age were independent risk factors for VA after adjustment for clinical, biochemical, and echocardiographic variables.
Albeit with low incidence, propafenone therapy for AF was associated with new-onset VA in the nationwide longitudinal cohort study in Taiwan. Old age, presence of inferior lead J wave, and wider QRS on ECG were significant risk factors in our single-center study.
在结构性正常心脏的心房颤动(AF)患者中,普罗帕酮治疗期间可能会发生室性心律失常(VA)。
本研究旨在评估结构性正常心脏的 AF 患者中普罗帕酮相关 VA 的发生率和特征。
我们在台湾的一项全国性纵向队列研究中,研究并比较了结构性正常心脏的 AF 患者服用和未服用普罗帕酮的新发 VA 风险(自 2000 年以来共有 127197 例患者)。然后,我们在一个单中心数据库中研究了结构性正常心脏的 AF 患者中普罗帕酮与 VA 之间的关系(n=396)。
在全国性队列中,102 例患者(0.008%/患者年)在 9.8±3.5 年的随访期间发生了室性心动过速(VT)/心室颤动(VF)。多变量 Cox 回归分析后,普罗帕酮治疗是新发 VT/VF 的显著危险因素,风险比(HR)为 3.59(95%置信区间[CI]1.30-9.89,P=0.0136)。普罗帕酮治疗为缺血性卒中提供了保护,HR 为 0.649(95%CI0.55-0.77,P<.001)。在使用心电图和病历的单中心研究中,在调整临床、生化和超声心动图变量后,下壁导联 J 波、QRS 波增宽和年龄较大是 VA 的独立危险因素。
尽管发生率较低,但在台湾的全国性纵向队列研究中,普罗帕酮治疗 AF 与新发 VA 相关。在我们的单中心研究中,年龄较大、下壁导联 J 波存在和心电图 QRS 波增宽是显著的危险因素。