Botto G L, Bonini W, Broffoni T, Molteni S, Lombardi R, Alfieri G, Barone P, Bernasconi G, Ferrari G
Department of Cardiology, St. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 2):1939-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03257.x.
A population of 283 patients with recent onset (< 72 hours) AF, without heart failure, who received a single 450- or 600-mg oral dose of propafenone, or digoxin 1 mg, or placebo for conversion to sinus rhythm (SR), was studied to determine whether a routine admission to the hospital for drug administration is justified. Previous bradyarrhythmias or sick sinus syndrome (SSS), and concomitant use of antiarrhythmic drugs were exclusion criteria. None of the 283 patients studied experienced VT or VF and none of them needed implantation of a temporary pacemaker. Periods of atrial tachyarrhythmias with regularization of atrial waves and 1:1 AV conduction were observed in only two cases, both receiving placebo. No predictor of proarrhythmia was found among the clinical variables considered (age, etiology, arrhythmia duration, atrial dimension, and blood potassium). No serious hemodynamic adverse effects were noted in either group. The rates of conversion to SR after 4 hours were: 80 (57%) of 141 patients who received propafenone and 35 (25%) of 142 patients who received digoxin or placebo (P < 0.001). Acute oral treatment with propafenone is simple and effective for the conversion of recent onset AF to SR in patients without clinical signs of heart failure. The routine admission of these patients to the hospital is not necessary. Home-based administration of oral propafenone to a selected group of patients could significantly increase the cost effectiveness of this treatment.
对283例近期发作(<72小时)房颤、无心力衰竭且接受单次450毫克或600毫克口服普罗帕酮、或1毫克地高辛、或安慰剂以转复为窦性心律(SR)的患者进行了研究,以确定常规住院给药是否合理。既往缓慢性心律失常或病态窦房结综合征(SSS)以及同时使用抗心律失常药物为排除标准。所研究的283例患者均未发生室性心动过速(VT)或室颤(VF),也均不需要植入临时起搏器。仅2例接受安慰剂的患者观察到心房快速心律失常伴心房波规整及1:1房室传导。在所考虑的临床变量(年龄、病因、心律失常持续时间、心房大小和血钾)中未发现促心律失常的预测因素。两组均未观察到严重的血流动力学不良反应。4小时后转复为SR的比例为:接受普罗帕酮的141例患者中有80例(57%),接受地高辛或安慰剂的142例患者中有35例(25%)(P<0.001)。对于无心力衰竭临床体征的患者,急性口服普罗帕酮治疗近期发作房颤转复为SR简单有效。这些患者常规住院并无必要。对选定患者组进行家庭口服普罗帕酮给药可显著提高该治疗的成本效益。