Knösel Michael, Ellenberger David, Göldner Yvonne, Sandoval Paulo, Wiechmann Dirk
Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), 37099, Göttingen, Germany.
Head Face Med. 2015 Apr 15;11:11. doi: 10.1186/s13005-015-0069-6.
Sealant application during fixed appliances orthodontic treatment for enamel protection is common, however, reliable data on its durability in vivo are rare.
This study aims at assessing the durability of a sealant (OpalSeal, Ultradent) for protection against white-spot lesion formation in orthodontic patients over 26 weeks in vivo, taking into account the provision or absence of an adequate oral hygiene. We tested the null hypothesis of (1) no significant abatement of the sealant after 26 weeks in fixed orthodontic treatment compared to baseline, and (2) no significant influence of the factor of brushing and oral hygiene (as screened by approximal plaque index, API) on the abatement of the sealant.
Integrity and abatement of OpalSeal applicated directly following bracketing was assessed in thirty-six consecutive patients (n(teeth) = 796) undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances (male/female 12/24; mean age/SD 14.4/1.33 Y). Assessment of the fluorescing sealant preservation was by a black-light lamp, using a classification that was concepted in analogy to the ARI index: (3, sealant completely preserved; 2= > 50% preserved; 1 = <50%; 0 = no sealant observable) immediately following application (Baseline, T0), after 2 (T1), 8 (T2), 14 (T3), 20 (T4) and 26 weeks (T5). API was assessed at T0 and T1. Statistical analysis was by non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA (α = 5%, power >80%).
At baseline, 43.4% of teeth had a positive API. Oral hygiene deteriorated after bracketing (T1, 53%) significantly. Null hypothesis (1) was rejected, while (2) was accepted: Mean values of both the well brushed and non-brushed anterior teeth undercut the score "1" at T3 (week 14). Despite a slightly better preservation of the sealer before and after T3 in not-sufficiently brushed (API-positive) teeth, this finding was statistically not significant.
One single application of OpalSeal is unlikely to last throughout the entire fixed appliance treatment stage. On average, re-application of the sealant can be expected to be necessary after 3.5 months (week 14) in treatment.
在固定矫治器正畸治疗期间应用封闭剂来保护牙釉质很常见,然而,关于其在体内耐久性的可靠数据却很少。
本研究旨在评估一种封闭剂(OpalSeal,Ultradent)在正畸患者体内26周内预防白斑病变形成的耐久性,同时考虑口腔卫生状况是否良好。我们检验了以下零假设:(1)与基线相比,固定正畸治疗26周后封闭剂无显著减少;(2)刷牙和口腔卫生因素(通过邻面菌斑指数,API筛查)对封闭剂减少无显著影响。
对36例接受固定矫治器正畸治疗的连续患者(n(牙齿)=796)(男/女12/24;平均年龄/标准差14.4/1.33岁),在直接粘贴托槽后应用的OpalSeal的完整性和减少情况进行评估。通过黑光灯对荧光封闭剂的保存情况进行评估,采用一种类似于ARI指数的分类方法:应用后立即(基线,T0)、2周后(T1)、8周后(T2)、14周后(T3)、20周后(T4)和26周后(T5)(3,表示封闭剂完全保存;2 =>50%保存;1 = <50%;0 = 未观察到封闭剂)。在T0和T1时评估API。采用非参数重复测量方差分析进行统计分析(α = 5%,检验效能>80%)。
基线时,43.4%的牙齿API为阳性。粘贴托槽后口腔卫生状况显著恶化(T1时为53%)。零假设(1)被拒绝,而(2)被接受:在T3(第14周)时,刷牙良好和未刷牙的前牙平均值均低于“1”分。尽管在刷牙不足(API阳性)的牙齿中,T3前后封闭剂的保存情况略好,但这一发现无统计学意义。
单次应用OpalSeal不太可能在整个固定矫治器治疗阶段持续有效。在治疗中,平均预计在3.5个月(第14周)后需要重新应用封闭剂。