50 Wimbledon Way, Marlton, NJ 08053, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jun;143(6):837-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.021.
In this study, we tested the efficacy of a tooth sealant polish (Biscover LV; Bisco, Schaumberg, Ill) to prevent enamel demineralization (white spot lesions) for the full duration of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. The trial design was an alternating-tooth split-mouth design.
Patients starting treatment with bonded appliances in a private practice were enrolled. The 6 maxillary anterior teeth received the test sealant or no sealant. The nonblinded orthodontists visually examined the teeth immediately after debonding and rated the presence and severity of white spot lesions using a 4-point scale. The difference in incidence of white spot lesions on treated and control teeth was tested with multivariate binary logistic regression for repeated measures by using the generalized estimating equations approach.
Sixty-five subjects were enrolled, and 3 were lost to follow-up, leaving 62 for analysis. There was a slightly lower incidence of white spot lesions on treated teeth (13.5%; 95% confidence interval, 8.6-18.4) compared with the control teeth (17.7%; 95% confidence interval, 12.4-23.7). This difference was statistically significant in the multivariate model (Wald chi-square, 5.07; df = 1; P = 0.024). The odds ratio was equal to 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.95) that treated teeth would show white spot lesions relative to the control teeth. White spot lesion severity was nearly the same for treated and control teeth (mean ± SD = 1.17 ± 0.47 and 1.20 ± 0.48, respectively; Wald chi-square, 3.03; df = 1; P = 0.082). No serious adverse effects were reported.
The sealant did not prevent all white spot lesions for the full duration of treatment. The sealant demonstrated a clinically small but statistically significant ability to prevent white spot lesions.
本研究旨在测试一种牙釉质封闭剂抛光剂(Biscover LV;Bisco,Schaumberg,Ill)在固定矫治器正畸治疗全程中预防牙釉质脱矿(白垩斑)的疗效。试验设计为交替牙分口设计。
在一家私人诊所开始接受粘接矫治器治疗的患者被纳入研究。6 颗上颌前牙接受了试验用封闭剂或不做处理。非盲法正畸医生在拆除托槽后立即对牙齿进行肉眼检查,并使用 4 分制对白斑病的存在和严重程度进行评分。采用广义估计方程方法对重复测量的多元二项逻辑回归进行分析,检验处理牙和对照牙之间白斑病发生率的差异。
共纳入 65 名受试者,其中 3 名失访,62 名进行了分析。与对照牙(17.7%;95%置信区间,12.4-23.7)相比,处理牙的白斑病发生率略低(13.5%;95%置信区间,8.6-18.4)。该差异在多变量模型中具有统计学意义(Wald 卡方,5.07;df=1;P=0.024)。处理牙出现白斑病的几率与对照牙相比为 0.68(95%置信区间,0.47-0.95)。处理牙和对照牙的白斑病严重程度几乎相同(均值±标准差=1.17±0.47 和 1.20±0.48,分别;Wald 卡方,3.03;df=1;P=0.082)。未报告严重不良事件。
该封闭剂未能在整个治疗期间预防所有的白斑病。该封闭剂具有预防白斑病的临床小但统计学显著的能力。