Nejadgholi Isar, Caytak Herschel, Bolic Miodrag, Batkin Izmail, Shirmohammadi Shervin
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
Physiol Meas. 2015 May;36(5):983-99. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/5/983. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
In several applications of bioimpedance spectroscopy, the measured spectrum is parameterized by being fitted into the Cole equation. However, the extracted Cole parameters seem to be inconsistent from one measurement session to another, which leads to a high standard deviation of extracted parameters. This inconsistency is modeled with a source of random variations added to the voltage measurement carried out in the time domain. These random variations may originate from biological variations that are irrelevant to the evidence that we are investigating. Yet, they affect the voltage measured by using a bioimpedance device based on which magnitude and phase of impedance are calculated.By means of simulated data, we showed that Cole parameters are highly affected by this type of variation. We further showed that singular value decomposition (SVD) is an effective tool for parameterizing bioimpedance measurements, which results in more consistent parameters than Cole parameters. We propose to apply SVD as a preprocessing method to reconstruct denoised bioimpedance measurements. In order to evaluate the method, we calculated the relative difference between parameters extracted from noisy and clean simulated bioimpedance spectra. Both mean and standard deviation of this relative difference are shown to effectively decrease when Cole parameters are extracted from preprocessed data in comparison to being extracted from raw measurements.We evaluated the performance of the proposed method in distinguishing three arm positions, for a set of experiments including eight subjects. It is shown that Cole parameters of different positions are not distinguishable when extracted from raw measurements. However, one arm position can be distinguished based on SVD scores. Moreover, all three positions are shown to be distinguished by two parameters, R0/R∞ and Fc, when Cole parameters are extracted from preprocessed measurements. These results suggest that SVD could be considered as an effective technique for overcoming the variability of bio-impedance spectroscopy measurements.
在生物阻抗光谱学的多个应用中,通过将测量光谱拟合到科尔方程来对其进行参数化。然而,从一次测量到另一次测量,提取的科尔参数似乎并不一致,这导致提取参数的标准差很高。这种不一致性通过在时域进行的电压测量中添加一个随机变化源来建模。这些随机变化可能源于与我们正在研究的证据无关的生物变化。然而,它们会影响使用生物阻抗设备测量的电压,基于该电压来计算阻抗的大小和相位。通过模拟数据,我们表明科尔参数受这种变化类型的影响很大。我们进一步表明,奇异值分解(SVD)是对生物阻抗测量进行参数化的有效工具,其产生的参数比科尔参数更一致。我们建议将SVD作为一种预处理方法来重建去噪后的生物阻抗测量。为了评估该方法,我们计算了从有噪声和干净的模拟生物阻抗光谱中提取的参数之间的相对差异。与从原始测量中提取科尔参数相比,当从预处理数据中提取科尔参数时,该相对差异的均值和标准差都有效降低。我们在一组包括八名受试者的实验中评估了所提出方法区分三种手臂位置的性能。结果表明,从原始测量中提取时,不同位置的科尔参数无法区分。然而,基于SVD分数可以区分一种手臂位置。此外,当从预处理测量中提取科尔参数时,通过两个参数R0/R∞和Fc可以区分所有三种位置。这些结果表明,SVD可被视为克服生物阻抗光谱测量变异性的有效技术。