Ghandhari Hassan, Fouladi Daniel Fadaei, Safari Mir Bahram, Ameri Ebrahim
Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic Teaching Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neurosciences Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Eur Spine J. 2016 Feb;25(2):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3952-8. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
To examine whether the sacro-femoral-pubic (SFP) angle could estimate pelvic tilt (PT) in scoliotic and normal subjects.
One hundred nine subjects including 38 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), 35 patients with congenital scoliosis (CS), and 36 healthy individuals were studied. PT, as the angle between the lines connecting the midpoint of the sacral plate to the centroid of one acetabulum and the vertical plane, and the SFP angle, as the angle between the midpoint of the upper sacral endplate, the centroid of one acetabulum, and the upper midpoint of the pubic symphysis, were calculated on full-length lateral and anteroposterior radiographs, respectively. Correlations between PT and the SFP angle were investigated in each group.
The three groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, and the mean SFP angle. The mean PT, however, was significantly lower in healthy subjects compared to that in patients with AIS and CS. Significant and reverse correlations were present between PT and the SFP angle in all three groups (AIS: r = -0.32, p = 0.04, PT = 82.5 - average SFP angle; CS: r = -0.48, p = 0.003, PT = 95.41 - average SFP angle; healthy: r = -0.33, p = 0.04, PT = 88.95 - average SFP angle).
Unlike two previous reports, the SFP angle correlated poorly to PT in this study, limiting its use as a suitable surrogate for PT in scoliotic and healthy subjects.
研究骶股耻骨(SFP)角能否评估脊柱侧弯患者和正常受试者的骨盆倾斜度(PT)。
对109名受试者进行研究,其中包括38例青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(AIS)患者、35例先天性脊柱侧弯(CS)患者和36名健康个体。分别在全长正侧位X线片上计算PT(即连接骶骨板中点与一侧髋臼中心的连线与垂直平面所成的角)和SFP角(即上骶骨终板中点、一侧髋臼中心和耻骨联合上中点所成的角)。研究每组中PT与SFP角之间的相关性。
三组在年龄、性别和平均SFP角方面具有可比性。然而,健康受试者的平均PT显著低于AIS和CS患者。三组中PT与SFP角均存在显著的负相关(AIS组:r = -0.32,p = 0.04,PT = 82.5 - 平均SFP角;CS组:r = -0.48,p = 0.003,PT = 95.41 - 平均SFP角;健康组:r = -0.33,p = 0.04,PT = 88.95 - 平均SFP角)。
与之前的两份报告不同,本研究中SFP角与PT的相关性较差,限制了其在脊柱侧弯患者和健康受试者中作为PT合适替代指标的应用。